systemml-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Berthold Reinwald" <reinw...@us.ibm.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Apache SystemML Release 1.0.0
Date Thu, 25 Aug 2016 23:00:35 GMT
fine by me considering that it would be indicative of a stable release.

Regards,
Berthold Reinwald
IBM Almaden Research Center
office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208
e-mail: reinwald@us.ibm.com



From:   Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
To:     dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date:   08/25/2016 03:45 PM
Subject:        Re: [DISCUSS] Apache SystemML Release 1.0.0



On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com> 
wrote:

> I'm still not fully convinced that we need to drop Spark 1.x support,
> instead of supporting both 1.x and 2.x. I would appreciate if we could
> first conclude the discussion around migrating to Spark 2.0.
>
> Furthermore, I think that creating a dependency to Spark versioning 
would
> unnecessarily complicate our own release process. I would rather use 
major
> releases as an opportunity to cleanup APIs and drop certain language
> features. And this is unlikely to coincide with Spark's releases. From 
my
> perspective it would be even more confusing for a user to release a 
major
> version for a relatively minor change as support for a new Spark 
version.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
>
I will leave the discussion about Spark 1.x and 2.x for the original
thread.

Trying to bring the topic back to the original subject, are we in 
consensus
that we could call the next release it SystemML 1.0 ?




-- 
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/





Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message