tajo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jihoon Son <jihoon...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Beyond 0.10.0 release
Date Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:36:47 GMT
I'd like to merge the index_support branch into the master.
I think it would be enough to be merged if two more issues are resolved.

Sincerely,
Jihoon

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:31 PM Jaehwa Jung <blrunner@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Hyunsik
>
> I totally agree with you.
>
> And if possible, could you add some examples for pluggable storage? For
> example, we're already working it such as, kafka, elasticsearch, cassandra.
>
> Cheers
> Jaehwa
> 2015. 3. 16. 오후 8:13에 "Hyunsik Choi" <hyunsik@apache.org>님이 작성:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > In order to share milestones with you guys and concentrate our effort
> > on the next release, we need to discuss the next roadmap.
> > Particularly, I'd like to share our direction with new contributors
> > due to the growing number of contributors.
> >
> > As far as I know, the following major issues seem to be resolved in time.
> >
> > * Nested complex type (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-721)
> > * in subquery (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-680)
> > * Resource allocation should be fine grained (TAJO-1397)
> > * ALTER TABLE ADD/DROP PARTITION statement (TAJO-744)
> > * Python UDF (TAJO-1344)
> >
> > The above issues probably can be included in 0.11 release. If there
> > are missed issues, please let me know them.
> >
> >
> > Besides, the following feature issues may be on our roadmap:
> >
> > * Multi-tenancy query scheduler (TAJO-540)
> > * More SQL features (scalar subquery, ...)
> >   * Decimal type support
> >   * Scalar subquery
> > * OLAP features (rollup, drill down, cube, ..)
> > * More rewrite rules (lots of issues like Unnesting of Nested Subqueries,
> > ...)
> > * Make storage handler more pluggable
> > * Better failure handling of tasks and nodes (TAJO-1214)
> > * CREATE FUNCTION statement support
> > * CREATE TYPE statement support
> > * ....
> >
> > Most of them are not assigned as far as I know. In addition, there are
> > many performance issues. I'll describe them later.
> >
> > Anyway, I would be pleasure if we task about what issues you are
> > considering for 0.11 release or after that. I'm looking forward to
> > hearing you guys' feedback.
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Hyunsik
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message