tajo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hyunsik Choi <hyun...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Beyond 0.10.0 release
Date Thu, 19 Mar 2015 22:35:05 GMT
Hi guys,

I roughly updated the roadmap for 0.11.0. Also, I also arranged the
roadmap 1.0.0.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TAJO/Tajo+Roadmap

I welcome any feedback.

Best regards,
Hyunsik

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org> wrote:
> If there are no further discussion, I'll update the Roadmap page in wiki.
>
> - hyunsik
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org> wrote:
>> Absolutely!
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> It sounds good to me.
>>>
>>> Also remember 'if it doesn't happen on the mailing list, it doesn't
>>> happen at Apache'. Please read the below mailing list thread, saying
>>> what we must keep.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCAJwFCa0CfjFGq5NcG7GNSPEZjg1hvy3NO-5_KfPd2ZXvc-SHKg@mail.gmail.com%3E
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Hyunsik
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Today we have a Tajo regional meetup in Seoul. What about discussing this
>>> > issue in detail there?
>>> >
>>> > Of course, we should post the result here, too.
>>> >
>>> > Warmly,
>>> > Dongjoon
>>> >
>>> > On Tuesday, March 17, 2015, Jinho Kim <jhkim@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> The major issues looks good to me for 0.11.0 release
>>> >> Thank you.
>>> >>
>>> >> -Jinho
>>> >> Best regards
>>> >>
>>> >> 2015-03-16 20:13 GMT+09:00 Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org
>>> <javascript:;>
>>> >> >:
>>> >>
>>> >> > Hi folks,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > In order to share milestones with you guys and concentrate our
effort
>>> >> > on the next release, we need to discuss the next roadmap.
>>> >> > Particularly, I'd like to share our direction with new contributors
>>> >> > due to the growing number of contributors.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > As far as I know, the following major issues seem to be resolved
in
>>> time.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > * Nested complex type (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-721
>>> )
>>> >> > * in subquery (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-680)
>>> >> > * Resource allocation should be fine grained (TAJO-1397)
>>> >> > * ALTER TABLE ADD/DROP PARTITION statement (TAJO-744)
>>> >> > * Python UDF (TAJO-1344)
>>> >> >
>>> >> > The above issues probably can be included in 0.11 release. If there
>>> >> > are missed issues, please let me know them.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Besides, the following feature issues may be on our roadmap:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > * Multi-tenancy query scheduler (TAJO-540)
>>> >> > * More SQL features (scalar subquery, ...)
>>> >> >   * Decimal type support
>>> >> >   * Scalar subquery
>>> >> > * OLAP features (rollup, drill down, cube, ..)
>>> >> > * More rewrite rules (lots of issues like Unnesting of Nested
>>> Subqueries,
>>> >> > ...)
>>> >> > * Make storage handler more pluggable
>>> >> > * Better failure handling of tasks and nodes (TAJO-1214)
>>> >> > * CREATE FUNCTION statement support
>>> >> > * CREATE TYPE statement support
>>> >> > * ....
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Most of them are not assigned as far as I know. In addition, there
are
>>> >> > many performance issues. I'll describe them later.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Anyway, I would be pleasure if we task about what issues you are
>>> >> > considering for 0.11 release or after that. I'm looking forward
to
>>> >> > hearing you guys' feedback.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Best regards,
>>> >> > Hyunsik
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>>

Mime
View raw message