From dev-return-5830-apmail-tajo-dev-archive=tajo.apache.org@tajo.apache.org  Mon Apr 20 08:58:31 2015
Return-Path: <dev-return-5830-apmail-tajo-dev-archive=tajo.apache.org@tajo.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-tajo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-tajo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CEDD17E23
	for <apmail-tajo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:58:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 50736 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2015 08:58:31 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-tajo-dev-archive@tajo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 50694 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2015 08:58:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tajo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@tajo.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@tajo.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@tajo.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.tajo.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@tajo.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tajo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 50683 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2015 08:58:30 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:58:30 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: message received from 54.76.25.247 which is an MX secondary for dev@tajo.apache.org)
Received: from [54.76.25.247] (HELO mx1-eu-west.apache.org) (54.76.25.247)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:58:04 +0000
Received: from mail-wg0-f43.google.com (mail-wg0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43])
	by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 08E0625F33
	for <dev@tajo.apache.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:58:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wgin8 with SMTP id n8so170964470wgi.0
        for <dev@tajo.apache.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 01:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=d58+KgpZ3q0Rpwyqe0NzWxXH6SC/TWlA2Obn84DZtx4=;
        b=T2fGEA1DHBb7GLbw6p1pP08Z3B0gjACpiXP0lNt0/SOqb4DXNEZxp/Ctq0wwqL8PYN
         sh1NTkZZHbsbDR9sPLxayXvD7zLA7MLAzAIPxg9Y8bzYq4JDPAfsoS2fmD4kOvmeQ+m6
         eF+ET+y3HApUjSQLh5e2nJJzda1tUPEraX+sBWg8l5S+Uih8QVbryRHt0xv9xhEg6u20
         gqedFs0xC9j05LhRtGm1DkGHAPneRbZZ7VbDQEUYh//uZu0U496Kv8zmtCy+2o2/POwk
         RKxEN2GNAiND++fK4tdYKgP5h7oEvvHKEmWpKKX7So3ltkTPkcQyiFjS5sOdrMJU5Euh
         ob2g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.159.105 with SMTP id xb9mr29071513wjb.156.1429520192762;
 Mon, 20 Apr 2015 01:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.56.199 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 01:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.56.199 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 01:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAM=XDd9v6OMsPViTY2Z7+FYBDb8j3iacu+8mZs3WTOE4EciAzQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAM=XDd9v6OMsPViTY2Z7+FYBDb8j3iacu+8mZs3WTOE4EciAzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:26:32 +0530
Message-ID: <CAOeZVicoFra4E8woUKUekoVVnr80iyDZmh4PuhVkXO2=2KjJoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] 0.10.1 release
From: Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com>
To: dev@tajo.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3aa584a18b60514241b69
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--001a11c3aa584a18b60514241b69
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

+1
On 20 Apr 2015 14:24, "Hyunsik Choi" <hyunsik@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> We planed to release minor releases for bug fixes. Since 0.10.0
> release in March 08, we have committed about 30 bug fixes and minor
> features to 0.10.1 branch. I think that now is the right time to
> release 0.10.1.
>
> How do you think about that?
>
> Best regards,
> Hyunsik
>

--001a11c3aa584a18b60514241b69--