tapestry-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From hls...@apache.org
Subject cvs commit: jakarta-tapestry STATUS.html
Date Tue, 02 Sep 2003 16:42:02 GMT
hlship      2003/09/02 09:42:02

  Modified:    .        STATUS.html
  Log:
  Add Harish Krishnaswamy as committer.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.6       +81 -44    jakarta-tapestry/STATUS.html
  
  Index: STATUS.html
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-tapestry/STATUS.html,v
  retrieving revision 1.5
  retrieving revision 1.6
  diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
  --- STATUS.html	14 Jul 2003 18:41:43 -0000	1.5
  +++ STATUS.html	2 Sep 2003 16:42:02 -0000	1.6
  @@ -12,67 +12,84 @@
   
   <h1>Committers</h1>
   
  +<!-- Keep these alphabetical -->
  +
   <ul>
   <li>Mind Bridge &lt;mindbridgeweb at yahoo dot com&gt;</li>
   <li>Neil Clayton &lt;neil at cloudnine dot net dot nz&gt;</li>
  +<li>Harish Krishnaswamy &lt;hkrishnaswamy at comcast dot net&gt;</li>
   <li>Richard Lewis-Shell &lt;rlewisshell at mac dot com&gt;</li>
   <li>Howard M. Lewis Ship &lt;hlship at apache dot org&gt;</li>
   <li>Geoff Longman &lt;glongman at intelligentworks dot com&gt;</li>
   <li>David Solis &lt;dsolis at legosoft dot com dot mx&gt;</li>
   </ul>
   
  +
  +<!-- Keep chronological; latest first -->
  +
   <h1>Votes - Release 3.0</h1>
   
  -<h2>Mar 7 2003 - Nominate David Solis as Tapestry Commiter</h2>
  +<h2>Sep 2 2003 - Harish Krishnaswamy as committer</h2>
   
   <blockquote>
  -<p>There really didn't seem to be much discussion ... everyone seems to be in favor.
 Mind Bridge seems very absent of late.</p>
  +I would like to nominate Harish; he has been very actively and
  +enthusiastically supporting Tapestry
  +in the mailing lists. I think he would be an excellent and valuable  
  +asset to the team.  And hell,
  +he's relatively local --- I might actually get to meet a Tapestry  
  +committer in person!
  +</blockquote>
   
  -<p>Let's put it to a vote.  No answer within 24 hours will be treated as a +0.</p>
  +<p>Results:
  +<ul>
  +<li>Howard Lewis Ship: +1</li>
  +<li>Geoff Longman: +1</li>
  +<li>David Solis: +1</li>
  +<li>Mindbridge: +1</li>
  +<li>Richard Lewis-Shell: +1</li>
  +<li>Neil Clayton: +0 (no vote)</li>
  +</ul>
  +</p>
  +	
  +<h2>Jul 13 2003 - Release 3.0-beta-2</h2>	
   
  -<p>If voted in, David Solis will be invited to become a Tapestry committer; will
be granted voting rights and update access to the CVS repository.	</p>
  +<blockquote>
  +We informally discussed this not too long ago; I think we are at a good point for beta-2.
 There have been some significant improvements since beta-1a that will largely be invisible
to most users (the correct thing for a beta release); at the same time, I think we're all
anxious to push forward and get Tapestry 3.0-xxx into wider distribution.  Although there
are still several outstanding bugs (one or two that are problematic) I think this is a good
time to keep momentum going and release the next beta.
  +
  +A +1 vote will procede with beta-2, tagging the repository and pushing the new releases
out to the Apache distribution mirrors.
   </blockquote>
   
   <p>Results:
   <ul>
   <li>Howard Lewis Ship: +1</li>
  -<li>Mind Bridge: +0</li>
  +<li>Mind Bridge: +1</li>
   <li>Neil Clayton: +1</li>
  -<li>Malcolm Edgar: +0</li>
   <li>Richard Lewis-Shell: +1</li>
   <li>Geoff Longman: +1</li>
  +<li>David Solis: +1</li>
   </ul>	
  -	
  +
   </p>
   
  -<h2>Apr 17 2003 - Tapestry NextGen released as 3.0</h2>
  +<h2>Jun 3 2003 - Release 3.0-beta-1a</h2>
   
   <blockquote>
  -<p>
  -The discussion on the version number for the next Tapestry release seems to have died down,
and there seemed fairly strong support for "3.0".
  -</p>	
  -
  -<p>
  -PROPOSAL: the next major release of Tapestry (previously known as 2.4 or
  -NextGen) be released as version number 3.0.
  -</p>
  -
  -<p>
  -Please vote before the end of (your) Tuesday (15 April), otherwise will assume +0.</p>
  +release 3.0-beta-1a ASAP (containing fixes for JDK 1.3)
   </blockquote>
   
   <p>Results:
   <ul>
  -	<li>Howard Lewis Ship: +1</li>
  -	<li>MindBridge: +1</li>
  -	<li>Richard Lewis-Shell: +1</li>
  -	<li>Geoff Longman: +1</li>
  -	<li>David Solis: +1</li>
  -	<li>Neil Clayton: +0 (no vote)</li>	
  -	</ul>	
  +<li>Howard Lewis Ship: +1</li>
  +<li>Mind Bridge: +1</li>
  +<li>Neil Clayton: +1</li>
  +<li>Richard Lewis-Shell: +1</li>
  +<li>Geoff Longman: +1</li>
  +<li>David Solis: +1</li>
  +</ul>	
   </p>
   
   
  +
   <h2>May 30 2003 - Release 3.0-beta-1</h2>
   
   <blockquote>
  @@ -93,41 +110,61 @@
   	
   </p>
   
  -
  -<h2>Jun 3 2003 - Release 3.0-beta-1a</h2>
  +<h2>Apr 17 2003 - Tapestry NextGen released as 3.0</h2>
   
   <blockquote>
  -release 3.0-beta-1a ASAP (containing fixes for JDK 1.3)
  +<p>
  +The discussion on the version number for the next Tapestry release seems to have died down,
and there seemed fairly strong support for "3.0".
  +</p>	
  +
  +<p>
  +PROPOSAL: the next major release of Tapestry (previously known as 2.4 or
  +NextGen) be released as version number 3.0.
  +</p>
  +
  +<p>
  +Please vote before the end of (your) Tuesday (15 April), otherwise will assume +0.</p>
   </blockquote>
   
   <p>Results:
   <ul>
  -<li>Howard Lewis Ship: +1</li>
  -<li>Mind Bridge: +1</li>
  -<li>Neil Clayton: +1</li>
  -<li>Richard Lewis-Shell: +1</li>
  -<li>Geoff Longman: +1</li>
  -<li>David Solis: +1</li>
  -</ul>	
  -	
  -<h2>Jul 13 2003 - Release 3.0-beta-2</h2>	
  +	<li>Howard Lewis Ship: +1</li>
  +	<li>MindBridge: +1</li>
  +	<li>Richard Lewis-Shell: +1</li>
  +	<li>Geoff Longman: +1</li>
  +	<li>David Solis: +1</li>
  +	<li>Neil Clayton: +0 (no vote)</li>	
  +	</ul>	
  +</p>
  +
  +
  +
  +
  +<h2>Mar 7 2003 - Nominate David Solis as Tapestry Commiter</h2>
   
   <blockquote>
  -We informally discussed this not too long ago; I think we are at a good point for beta-2.
 There have been some significant improvements since beta-1a that will largely be invisible
to most users (the correct thing for a beta release); at the same time, I think we're all
anxious to push forward and get Tapestry 3.0-xxx into wider distribution.  Although there
are still several outstanding bugs (one or two that are problematic) I think this is a good
time to keep momentum going and release the next beta.
  +<p>There really didn't seem to be much discussion ... everyone seems to be in favor.
 Mind Bridge seems very absent of late.</p>
   
  -A +1 vote will procede with beta-2, tagging the repository and pushing the new releases
out to the Apache distribution mirrors.
  +<p>Let's put it to a vote.  No answer within 24 hours will be treated as a +0.</p>
  +
  +<p>If voted in, David Solis will be invited to become a Tapestry committer; will
be granted voting rights and update access to the CVS repository.	</p>
   </blockquote>
   
   <p>Results:
   <ul>
   <li>Howard Lewis Ship: +1</li>
  -<li>Mind Bridge: +1</li>
  +<li>Mind Bridge: +0</li>
   <li>Neil Clayton: +1</li>
  +<li>Malcolm Edgar: +0</li>
   <li>Richard Lewis-Shell: +1</li>
   <li>Geoff Longman: +1</li>
  -<li>David Solis: +1</li>
   </ul>	
  -
  +	
   </p>
  +
  +
  +
  +
  +
   </body>
   </html>
  
  
  

Mime
View raw message