tapestry-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com>
Subject [DISCUSS] Tapestry Release Names
Date Fri, 01 Apr 2005 17:23:27 GMT
So, the current debate about Tapestry 3.1 vs. Tapestry 4.0 underscores why 
so many projects use a release name not a release number for upcoming 

I think Tapestry should start doing that; express the road map with release 

I was just IM-ing with Erik, and brainstorming a "theme" for release names. 
The one we liked was city names. I chose a few favorite cities, with easy 
(single word) names: Portland, Vancouver, Boston, Amsterdam , etc.

So here's a possible roadmap:

   - Tapestry Portland: HiveMind integration + Portlet support (aka 3.1or 
   - Tapestry Vancouver: Remove inheritance requirements, remove abstract 
   methods/classes (probably 5.0), more sensible naming, etc.
    - Tapestry Amsterdam: Re-implement in Ruby :-)


Howard M. Lewis Ship
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
Creator, Jakarta HiveMind

Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
and project work. http://howardlewisship.com

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message