tapestry-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexandru Popescu <the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: testing....testng?
Date Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:33:49 GMT
Addressed the issue. Apologise Tapestry :-).

./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.

On 2/13/06, Kevin Menard <kmenard@servprise.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:24:57 -0500, Jesse Kuhnert <jkuhnert@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Is it really breaking the java annotation spec if you do a search on
> > super
> > classes as well?
> >
> > Either way I understand the frustration but don't think I can help if the
> > two core devs already voted -1 on this feature. Hmmm...
>
> Well, the issue I raised in this thread is actually a bit different from
> what you saw on the TestNG list.  Since Alexandru responded separately
> here, I'll try to clarify the issue for him a bit more.  Like I said, at
> least they're responsive :-)
>
> See http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/TESTNG-19 for more details.  The
> initial report was based on my misunderstanding of how the annotations
> worked, but there still is a problem with using template methods.  The
> example there is weak, so I'll provide a stronger one.
>
> --
> Kevin
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message