tapestry-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Martin Strand" <do.not.eat.yellow.s...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r492313 - in /tapestry/tapestry5/tapestry-core/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/tapestry/internal/parser/ main/java/org/apache/tapestry/internal/services/ main/java/org/apache/tapestry/internal/test/ main/java/org/apache/tapestry/servi
Date Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:56:30 GMT
Perhaps the @Parameter annotation could simply have a defaultPrefix  

IValidator validate;

Object value;

<input type="text" validate="required" value="someProperty"/>

But you'd still be able to use any prefix explicitly:
<input type="text" validate="prop:customValidator" value="someProperty"/>


On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:41:37 +0100, Massimo Lusetti <mlusetti@gmail.com>  

> On 1/3/07, hlship@apache.org <hlship@apache.org> wrote:
>> Author: hlship
>> Date: Wed Jan  3 13:41:45 2007
>> New Revision: 492313
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=492313
>> Log:
>> Remove ClasspathAssetSource, moving its functionality to AssetSource.
>> Allow for "invisibile instrumentation" inside component templates.
>> Allow page ("root component") templates to be stored in the web  
>> application root.
> One thing.
> With the old template mechanism from T4 i can sign a contract with my
> web designers to have them name a 'component' on a page 'username' and
> to keep it a <input type="text"> HTML element, then i can manipulate
> it with java and xml .page bindings, so i end up with HTML templates
> with just jwcid added and no more bloat for the web designers but i
> can still control the whole behavior of the page.
> With T5 this seems no more possible, i mean this syntax is by far more
> preferable then the first one but not like the one from T4. I need to
> instruments the designers to learn this parameters or have me or
> another developer do some glue-code every time a designer changes
> something, at the end they're not so independent with respect of GUI
> appearance and I'm a 'slave' of their changes.
> I understand that there is to be a merge point between the two
> factions but from my experience designers are less in tilts to type
> then developers.
> I take this with respect to:
> http://tapestryjava.blogspot.com/2007/01/latest-t5-snapshots-invisible.html
> which this post would have been a comment.
> Anyway, i would like to suggest a different way to go. One could be to
> add more knowledge to the annotation side of the 'bindings' while keep
> the (X)HTML side as clean as possible.
> Add the "validate", "type", "value" knowledge to the Parameter
> annotation instead of the template markup, after all doesn't these all
> are of interest and care of the developer?
> I hope to have been been clear enough with my thoughts :)
> With best regards.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org

View raw message