That could be a problem indeed, especially given the 3 vote minimum.
More details at: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
In reading that, you may find that it gets a little murky with regards to
PMC votes for non-code modifications. But, at that point, I guess you would
have to have a solid definition of who gets binding and who doesn't. At
that point, it's probably easiest/best to just add the responsible parties
to the project's PMC.
--
Kevin
On 10/23/07 1:17 PM, in article
ecd0e3310710231017r28a7c6b1m27bc7783fa520275@mail.gmail.com, "Howard Lewis
Ship" <hlship@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll look into this next week ... right now I think Jesse and I are the only
> active PMC members (though I'll have to check). Many of the others:
> Mindbridge, Geoff Longman, etc., have "wandered off".
>
> On 10/23/07, Kevin Menard <kmenard@servprise.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm quite certain he needs to be on the PMC for his vote to be
>> binding. We
>> ran into this ourselves over at the Cayenne project.
>>
>> --
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>> On 10/22/07 11:01 PM, in article
>> ecd0e3310710222001h2c73846fn6d67c690904a4286@mail.gmail.com, "Howard Lewis
>> Ship" <hlship@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> And that really is the question: on this vote is committer status enough
>> for
>>> a binding vote, or do we need to get you onto the PMC?
>>>
>>> On 10/22/07, Dan Adams <dan@ifactory.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
|