tapestry-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Henning Petersen (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (TAP5-2016) Scala style properties unnecessarily require a field with the same name
Date Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:48:12 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Henning Petersen updated TAP5-2016:
-----------------------------------

    Attachment: TAP5-2016.patch

This patch (for the 5.3 branch) allows Scala properties without a corresponding field if there
is both a setter and a getter, including a new test case that covers the issue.

It works only for properties with both a getter and a setter, because it is impossible to
tell a getter of a read-only property from an ordinary method with a return value in Scala.


To use a read-only property, you'd still use the method call syntax, e.g. ${bean.value()},
while you can use the property syntax for read-write properties (where it matters), e.g. t:value="bean.value".
                
> Scala style properties unnecessarily require a field with the same name
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAP5-2016
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2016
>             Project: Tapestry 5
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: tapestry-ioc
>    Affects Versions: 5.3.6, 5.2.5
>            Reporter: Henning Petersen
>              Labels: scala
>         Attachments: TAP5-2016.patch
>
>
> The changes introduced with TAP5-1064 allow Scala-style properties to be used from components
without the need for Java-style getters and setters. The implementation currently requires
a field of the same name as the property to exist on the bean, which is unfortunate. 
> A class which delegates property access to a backing bean is not recognized by PropertyAccessImpl
as having any valid properties; the same is the case when the field has a different name than
the property.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message