tapestry-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bob Harner <bobhar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Abstract layer or jquery all the way?
Date Fri, 26 Oct 2012 01:41:02 GMT
A big +1 for the abstraction layer. Sure, everybody is using jQuery
now, but what in about a year or two? There is always a new "hot"
thing around the corner, especially in JavaScript land.

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
<thiagohp@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for SPI. I think it wouldn't end up large, covering mostly DOM node
> searching (Prototype's $$() and jQuery's $()), list processing (foreach) and
> event binding. Howard, you're already working on the JavaScript rewriting,
> so you're the right person to tell me if I'm right or not. :)
>
>
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:28:21 -0200, Howard Lewis Ship <hlship@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> As much fun as I've been having with the JavaScript abstraction layer
>> ... is it really needed?
>>
>> Could we please 90% (99% ?) of our users by providing jQuery out of
>> the box, and coding the Tapestry support directly against it?
>>
>> How many people will care about the SPI?  How many will stay on
>> Prototype when jQuery is an option?  How many will be desperate top
>> use just MooTools. or just YUI, or just Dojo, and can't handle having
>> anything else?
>>
>> Just want to explore all the options.
>>
>
>
> --
> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org


Mime
View raw message