tez-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bikas Saha <bi...@apache.org>
Subject RE: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9
Date Thu, 02 Feb 2017 19:49:04 GMT
I would say to look for all deprecations tags and remove them in 0.9.0 :) 

If someone complains (ideally during the RC) then they have time to upgrade because they now
know about it. Or we could consider relaxing a few if really needed.

Bikas

-----Original Message-----
From: Siddharth Seth [mailto:sseth@apache.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 6:18 PM
To: dev@tez.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9

This would be the right time to get rid of deprecated methods. I suspect we'll need to look
at them on a case by case basis though. Do you have a list of these?

Anyone else has thoughts on releases?

Thanks,
Sid

On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Bikas Saha <bikas@apache.org> wrote:

> +1.
>
> On release schedule, we could consider getting onto a time based 
> release schedule - e.g. a release every 4 months so there is a regular 
> cadence of bug fix releases at least.
>
> Should we remove any deprecations since 0.7 in 0.9 given a couple of 
> releases have passed?
>
> Bikas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Siddharth Seth [mailto:sseth@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 1:37 PM
> To: dev@tez.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9
>
> There hasn't been any release for some time.
>
> 0.8 - I'd like to create a new release in the next 2 weeks. There's 
> quite a few bug fixes. TEZ-3244 would be a good candidate to get in so 
> that there's a consumable build.
>
> 0.9 - Already has changes for Fair custom data routing, Cartesian 
> product, quite a few UI enhancements. Two big items under development 
> are the Parallel edge between vertices and the Tez shuffle handler. 
> Would like to get thoughts on a release schedule for 0.9.
> We could create a beta with the 2 pending items missing, and a 
> non-beta once the remaining 2 features go in (or by time).
> Alternately, create a non-beta release around mid-end March - with 
> whichever features are available.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Sid
>

Mime
View raw message