tez-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Siddharth Seth <ss...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9
Date Fri, 03 Feb 2017 18:50:48 GMT
Any volunteers to take up the deprecation hunt?

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Bikas Saha <bikas@apache.org> wrote:

> That’s a good idea. Though we (at least I) don’t know enough about those
> code bases to determine if an API upgrade is a lot or little work in there.
> My gut feeling is that we will find everyone is still using deprecated
> API's :)
>
> Bikas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Eagles [mailto:jeagles@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 12:34 PM
> To: dev@tez.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9
>
> Can we do a cursory glance at deprecated APIs and how they are used in
> know Tez application (pig, hive, cascading)? This will save us some time in
> knowing if something has broken.
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Bikas Saha <bikas@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I would say to look for all deprecations tags and remove them in 0.9.0
> > :)
> >
> > If someone complains (ideally during the RC) then they have time to
> > upgrade because they now know about it. Or we could consider relaxing
> > a few if really needed.
> >
> > Bikas
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Siddharth Seth [mailto:sseth@apache.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 6:18 PM
> > To: dev@tez.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9
> >
> > This would be the right time to get rid of deprecated methods. I
> > suspect we'll need to look at them on a case by case basis though. Do
> > you have a list of these?
> >
> > Anyone else has thoughts on releases?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sid
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Bikas Saha <bikas@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1.
> > >
> > > On release schedule, we could consider getting onto a time based
> > > release schedule - e.g. a release every 4 months so there is a
> > > regular cadence of bug fix releases at least.
> > >
> > > Should we remove any deprecations since 0.7 in 0.9 given a couple of
> > > releases have passed?
> > >
> > > Bikas
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Siddharth Seth [mailto:sseth@apache.org]
> > > Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 1:37 PM
> > > To: dev@tez.apache.org
> > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9
> > >
> > > There hasn't been any release for some time.
> > >
> > > 0.8 - I'd like to create a new release in the next 2 weeks. There's
> > > quite a few bug fixes. TEZ-3244 would be a good candidate to get in
> > > so that there's a consumable build.
> > >
> > > 0.9 - Already has changes for Fair custom data routing, Cartesian
> > > product, quite a few UI enhancements. Two big items under
> > > development are the Parallel edge between vertices and the Tez shuffle
> handler.
> > > Would like to get thoughts on a release schedule for 0.9.
> > > We could create a beta with the 2 pending items missing, and a
> > > non-beta once the remaining 2 features go in (or by time).
> > > Alternately, create a non-beta release around mid-end March - with
> > > whichever features are available.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sid
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message