thrift-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rush Manbert <r...@manbert.com>
Subject Re: Windows Timers - Seeking Opinions
Date Thu, 28 May 2009 17:59:26 GMT
Hi Norman,

Plain old boost::date_time was my first attempt, but it uses the  
counter that updates at 60 hz. That's the only reason I looked at  
anything else.

Best regards,
Rush

On May 28, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Casagrande, Norman wrote:

> I am probably missing something, but have you tried boost::date_time
> library?
>
> boost::posix_time::ptime now =
> boost::posix_time::microsec_clock::local_time();
>
> How does it compare in terms of efficiency?
> --
> Norman
>
>
>>

Mime
View raw message