thrift-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Riley <m...@eucleo.com>
Subject Re: **** SPAM [ 10.8 ] **** Re: Pure C implementation
Date Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:20:17 GMT
There's still a bit of work to be done.  I have the basic data structures,
a few protocols and a memory transport done.  My plan is to finish the
struct generator in the next week or so.  Hopefully, at that point, I'll
get some help with the service stuff and general cleanup.

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Roger Meier <roger@bufferoverflow.ch>
wrote:

> cool stuff!
> thrift-nano is a great thing, a pure C implementation was already
> requested by many users.
> I hope we can get this merged into Apache Thrift. Patches are welcome!
>
> cheers
> -roger
>
> Quoting David Itkin <ditkin@eucleo.com>:
>
>  Tyler,
>>
>> I work with someone that did just that.  Look here:
>>
>>    https://github.com/markrileybot/thrift-nano
>>
>> The author is not on this mailing list but will be soon.
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Tyler Conant <gosuperninja@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  I’m looking to serialize structures on a micro controller. I would like
>>> to
>>> specifically use thrift to do the serialization. The backend already uses
>>> thrift so I would prefer to keep with the same IDL. I see there is a C
>>> thrift library, however it uses Glib. Getting Glib to fit and compile on
>>> the micro may not be feasible. Does anyone know of a pure C
>>> implementation,
>>> I don’t need the service interface or transports,  only the serialization
>>> part of thrift?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>>
>> David Itkin
>> ditkin@eucleo.com
>> (cel) 703-869-4675
>>
>
>
>


-- 
-mark

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message