thrift-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tamás Szelei <hello.szt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Benchmarking Thrift
Date Sun, 05 Feb 2017 11:00:17 GMT
Hi,

Thanks. I haven't seen this, but I also don't speak Chinese (Google
translate seems ok-ish though). In any case, I forgot to mention that my
benchmark measures the C++ implementations, whereas the post you linked
measures Java.

Regards,
Tamás

On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Jens Geyer <jensgeyer@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> have you seen this?
>
> http://www.useopen.net/blog/2015/rpc-performance.html
>
> have fun,
> JensG
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> From: Tamás Szelei
> Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2017 10:52 AM
> To: user@thrift.apache.org
> Subject: Benchmarking Thrift
>
> Hello all,
>
> I'm creating a benchmark of RPC solutions and Thrift is one of them.
> Similarly to unit tests, each RPC solution has a fixture where the
> infrastructure for performing calls is set up. The benchmarks then measure
> the performance of various scenarios. In all cases, the fixtures create
> both a client and server and synchronous calls are performed.
>
> It is still a WIP, but I would like to get your input on the setup code I
> implemented, i.e. whether or not this is a fair entry in such a benchmark
> and if there are any possible areas of improvement. The code is here:
> https://github.com/rpclib/benchmarks/blob/master/include/thrift/fixture.h
>
> FWIW Thrift seems to be performing quite well in these early measurements.
>
> Also, if there are any known scenarios where Thrift is expected to
> outperform outhers, please let me know.
>
>
> Regards,
> Tamás Szelei
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message