From dev-return-3675-apmail-tika-dev-archive=tika.apache.org@tika.apache.org Wed Jul 14 09:29:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tika-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 80222 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2010 09:29:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Jul 2010 09:29:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 42152 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2010 09:29:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tika-dev-archive@tika.apache.org Received: (qmail 41967 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2010 09:29:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tika.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@tika.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tika.apache.org Received: (qmail 41958 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2010 09:29:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:29:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.182] (HELO mail-iw0-f182.google.com) (209.85.214.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:29:21 +0000 Received: by iwn35 with SMTP id 35so8419999iwn.13 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 02:28:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RI8gD8xAH5iSLFz43GOO2j+DxIj+vRyoGnIXLSoP5IY=; b=rk6aADBnUTCAxa2D6TdWckxPnTUuDMG2z0KH2F2kkbBMFFC+b4kvTViBdvi3M2is9+ /bo5epPk3bi3DYxXxz552iGdXRRNGl5cojTIzCo4LgcMcTxRsEtyh6GTPq/KZwGNnSpl aIch7+I23hV0xHxIUb/Sv+6kl3q7nJ3OOaQvQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SPU0/7uRPPVrx4d4fp88bHPgKQgdFBGtBYuTmWYu1u8OiXCKWGWM3KL6OLLjVbc87I svHi8cV+taVfm1L5jt1DluuK2nCq/nLo0n5MmYQxUBK4t0cSGc3lB98UNcEevqiT+Dbu BSxtvjn4HZQek0fxmKnE5L46QsQwAOJMw0O9w= Received: by 10.42.6.193 with SMTP id b1mr5601043icb.60.1279099680198; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 02:28:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.155.11 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 02:27:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <04da01cb2284$db38a0a0$91a9e1e0$@com.au> References: <20100712173546.4E450C0094@aegis.apache.org> <04da01cb2284$db38a0a0$91a9e1e0$@com.au> From: Jukka Zitting Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:27:40 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk To: builds@apache.org Cc: dev@tika.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Gav... wrote: > For future, let me know please if you think it helpful that Tika builds > continue on Buildbot - with any improvements of extra steps/features > you want covering, or if you don=92t see any point and would like it remo= ved. We already have a Hudson build [1] that I've been managing. There's nothing wrong having an extra CI build (the more the merrier!), but it needs to be managed by someone on the Tika team to avoid confusion like the one that triggered this thread. So unless someone volunteers to maintain the Buildbot build, I think it's better to remove it. [1] http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Tika-trunk/ BR, Jukka Zitting