tika-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache TIka 1.4 Release Candidate #1
Date Sun, 16 Jun 2013 18:17:15 GMT
Hi Chris,

Am 16.06.2013 20:07, schrieb Chris Mattmann:
> Ouch, just saw this. Oliver, I'm happy to commit the updated patch
> to the trunk but do you absolutely need this in 1.4 requiring me
> to spin up an RC #3?

sorry for being late on this.

No, I don't need this code absolutely in the 1.4 release. I just was a 
bit worried about cutting a release with a known bug. I am not sure how 
often this problem will actually occur in practice.

Oliver

>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oliver Heger <oliver.heger@oliver-heger.de>
> Reply-To: "dev@tika.apache.org" <dev@tika.apache.org>
> Date: Sunday, June 16, 2013 10:25 AM
> To: "dev@tika.apache.org" <dev@tika.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache TIka 1.4 Release Candidate #1
>
>> Am 16.06.2013 05:52, schrieb Chris Mattmann:
>>> Hi Guys,
>>>
>>> A candidate for the Tika 1.4 release is available at:
>>>
>>>       http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-tika-1.4/rc1/
>>>
>>> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tika/tags/1.4/
>>>
>>>
>>> The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
>>> 1e523c6ed06b4d095d7f6e93a04a8d2ab43c7226.
>>>
>>> A staged M2 repository can also be found on repository.apache.org here:
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetika-020/
>>>
>>>
>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tika 1.4.
>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
>>> least three +1 Tika PMC votes are cast.
>>>
>>>       [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tika 1.4
>>>       [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>
>>> Here is my +1 for the release.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Chris
>>>
>>
>> There is a minor issue with TIKA-991: The original patch had been
>> applied, but in the meantime I discovered that the code could enter an
>> infinite loop under certain circumstances. Therefore, I provided a
>> second patch (the small attachment from Feb 15th). Could this patch be
>> applied, too, before the release?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Oliver
>>
>
>


Mime
View raw message