tika-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Oleg Tikhonov <olegtikho...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache TIka 1.4 Release Candidate #1
Date Sun, 16 Jun 2013 18:16:38 GMT
I've tried to send some comments about release candidate, however got
"delivery failure" error. I'm out of list ?

BR,
Oleg


On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Chris Mattmann <mattmann@apache.org> wrote:

> Ouch, just saw this. Oliver, I'm happy to commit the updated patch
> to the trunk but do you absolutely need this in 1.4 requiring me
> to spin up an RC #3?
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oliver Heger <oliver.heger@oliver-heger.de>
> Reply-To: "dev@tika.apache.org" <dev@tika.apache.org>
> Date: Sunday, June 16, 2013 10:25 AM
> To: "dev@tika.apache.org" <dev@tika.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache TIka 1.4 Release Candidate #1
>
> >Am 16.06.2013 05:52, schrieb Chris Mattmann:
> >> Hi Guys,
> >>
> >> A candidate for the Tika 1.4 release is available at:
> >>
> >>      http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-tika-1.4/rc1/
> >>
> >> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
> >>
> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tika/tags/1.4/
> >>
> >>
> >> The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
> >> 1e523c6ed06b4d095d7f6e93a04a8d2ab43c7226.
> >>
> >> A staged M2 repository can also be found on repository.apache.org here:
> >>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetika-020/
> >>
> >>
> >> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tika 1.4.
> >> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> >> least three +1 Tika PMC votes are cast.
> >>
> >>      [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tika 1.4
> >>      [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >>
> >> Here is my +1 for the release.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Chris
> >>
> >
> >There is a minor issue with TIKA-991: The original patch had been
> >applied, but in the meantime I discovered that the code could enter an
> >infinite loop under certain circumstances. Therefore, I provided a
> >second patch (the small attachment from Feb 15th). Could this patch be
> >applied, too, before the release?
> >
> >Thanks
> >Oliver
> >
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message