Y, I'll try to be more careful about separating out formatting from content in the future (apologies
for TIKA-1451). What I didn't want to do was start an IDE war if others have different settings
that will order imports in a different way.
Thank you!
-----Original Message-----
From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980) [mailto:chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 1:53 AM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: import (re)ordering?
Hey Tim,
No big objections from me, but it will dilute things so glad we
have it noted if it happens.
Cheers,
Chris
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: <Allison>, "Timothy B." <tallison@mitre.org>
Reply-To: "dev@tika.apache.org" <dev@tika.apache.org>
Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 at 1:59 PM
To: "dev@tika.apache.org" <dev@tika.apache.org>
Subject: import (re)ordering?
>All,
> I have Intellij set to order imports by javax, java, then other. I
>think this is the most common pattern in Tika. Is it ok if I make these
>(meaningless/formatting) changes when I commit other changes?
> Thank you.
>
> Best,
>
> Tim
|