tika-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Nick Burch (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (TIKA-1706) Bring back commons-io to tika-core
Date Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:06:11 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15028642#comment-15028642

Nick Burch commented on TIKA-1706:

Does anyone have any objections to us going ahead with this for Tika 1.12?

If no objections are raised in 1 week (by 2015-12-03), then I think we should go ahead and

> Bring back commons-io to tika-core
> ----------------------------------
>                 Key: TIKA-1706
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1706
>             Project: Tika
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Yaniv Kunda
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.12
>         Attachments: TIKA-1706-1.patch, TIKA-1706-2.patch
> TIKA-249 inlined select commons-io classes in order to simplify the dependency tree and
save some space.
> I believe these arguments are weaker nowadays due to the following concerns:
> - Most of the non-core modules already use commons-io, and since tika-core is usually
not used by itself, commons-io is already included with it
> - Since some modules use both tika-core and commons-io, it's not clear which code should
be used
> - Having the inlined classes causes more maintenance and/or technology debt (which in
turn causes more maintenance)
> - Newer commons-io code utilizes newer platform code, e.g. using Charset objects instead
of encoding names, being able to use StringBuilder instead of StringBuffer, and so on.
> I'll be happy to provide a patch to replace usages of the inlined classes with commons-io
classes if this is accepted.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message