Agreed.
Luis
2017-06-29 15:45 GMT-03:00 Bob Paulin <bob@bobpaulin.com>:
> If we're adding features does it make sense just to bump to 1.16 rather
> than 1.15.1? Traditionally point releases would be bug fixes only [1].
>
>
> - Bob
>
> [1] http://semver.org/
> On 6/29/2017 1:18 PM, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
> > K.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mattmann, Chris A (3010) [mailto:chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 1:59 PM
> > To: dev@tika.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Tika 1.15.1?
> >
> > Hey Tim, I’d like to try and get in:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1988
> >
> > today for 15.1. I am working on integrating it now and adding some docs
> to the wiki.
> >
> > I’ll keep you posted.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++++++++
> > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> > Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010)
> Manager, NSF & Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Offices
> (8212) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> > Office: 180-503E, Mailstop: 180-503
> > Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++++++++
> > Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) Adjunct
> Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern
> California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> > WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++++++++
> >
> >
> > On 6/28/17, 12:24 PM, "Allison, Timothy B." <tallison@mitre.org> wrote:
> >
> > POI is available on maven, and I just upgraded.
> >
> > Unless there are objections, I'll change our
> >
> > org.apache.tika.parser.sentiment.analysis.SentimentParser
> >
> > to
> >
> > org.apache.tika.parser.sentiment.analysis.SentimentAnalysisParser
> >
> > and we should be good to go for 1.15.1?
> >
> > Let me know if you'd like to hold off for a bit, but there's always
> 1.15.2. :)
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Tim
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mattmann, Chris A (3010) [mailto:chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov
> ]
> > Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 3:39 PM
> > To: dev@tika.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Tika 1.15.1?
> >
> > Let me get back to you I’d like to see if we can get some progress
> on the Age Detector Parser
> >
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++++++++
> > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> > Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010)
> Manager, NSF & Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Offices
> (8212) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> > Office: 180-503E, Mailstop: 180-503
> > Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++++++++
> > Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS)
> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of
> Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> > WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++++++++
> >
> >
> > On 6/23/17, 10:01 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." <tallison@mitre.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> > With the exception of the SentimentParser (which we have a
> path forward on), I think we're good to go. It looks like POI is about to
> kick off the release process for 3.17-beta1, and the batch results look
> good. I propose waiting a week or so to incorporate that.
> > Anything else we need to get in for 1.15.1?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Tim
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Mattmann [mailto:mattmann@apache.org]
> > Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 2:43 PM
> > To: dev@tika.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Tika 1.15.1?
> >
> > Yep agreed on both Tim. If I don’t get it done this weekend,
> we’ll apply the approach you mention below.
> >
> > Great seeing you yesterday!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/16/17, 11:40 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." <tallison@mitre.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I'm hoping to wrap up the TEIParser next week (I'm thinking
> about modifying code to handle DOM)...and this should rid us of org.json
> licensing issues. Run a release for 1.15.1 probably the following week?
> >
> > Anything else we want to get in to 1.15.1?
> >
> > Chris, I'm not sure where you are on the SentimentParser.
> If there will be a quick fix, great; otherwise, we should be ok with the
> added exclusions (TIKA-2397) and if we rename the class in Tika so that we
> don't have a conflict over oat.parsers.SentimentParser (TIKA-2368).
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Tim
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tyler Bui-Palsulich [mailto:tbpalsulich@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 8:39 PM
> > To: dev@tika.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Tika 1.16?
> >
> > +1 to 1.15.1.
> >
> > It would also be nice to be able to have "cheap" security
> releases as they come up.
> >
> > Tyler
> >
> > On Jun 2, 2017 6:12 AM, "Bob Paulin" <bob@bobpaulin.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Would be breaking a bit from the current release numbering
> but I'd
> > > fully support moving to semantic versioning. +1 to a
> 1.15.1
> > >
> > > - Bob
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/2/2017 8:06 AM, Luís Filipe Nassif wrote:
> > > > Maybe 1.15.1?
> > > >
> > > > Em 1 de jun de 2017 10:03 AM, "Bob Paulin" <
> bob@bobpaulin.com> escreveu:
> > > >
> > > >> +1
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 6/1/2017 6:50 AM, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
> > > >>> Given the broken OSGi and the org.json issues with
> 1.15, does it
> > > >>> make
> > > >> sense to aim for 1.16 fairly soon, say 3-4 weeks?
> > > >>> Cheers,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Tim
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
|