tika-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Allison, Timothy B." <talli...@mitre.org>
Subject RE: Tika 1.15.1?
Date Fri, 23 Jun 2017 17:01:39 GMT
All,
  With the exception of the SentimentParser (which we have a path forward on), I think we're
good to go.  It looks like POI is about to kick off the release process for 3.17-beta1, and
the batch results look good.  I propose waiting a week or so to incorporate that.
  Anything else we need to get in for 1.15.1?

         Cheers,

                  Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Mattmann [mailto:mattmann@apache.org] 
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 2:43 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tika 1.15.1?

Yep agreed on both Tim. If I don’t get it done this weekend, we’ll apply the approach
you mention below.

Great seeing you yesterday!




On 6/16/17, 11:40 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." <tallison@mitre.org> wrote:

    All,
    
    I'm hoping to wrap up the TEIParser next week (I'm thinking about modifying code to handle
DOM)...and this should rid us of org.json licensing issues.  Run a release for 1.15.1 probably
the following week?
    
    Anything else we want to get in to 1.15.1?
    
    Chris, I'm not sure where you are on the SentimentParser.  If there will be a quick fix,
great; otherwise, we should be ok with the added exclusions (TIKA-2397) and if we rename the
class in Tika so that we don't have a conflict over oat.parsers.SentimentParser (TIKA-2368).
    
    Cheers,
    
              Tim
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Tyler Bui-Palsulich [mailto:tbpalsulich@gmail.com] 
    Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 8:39 PM
    To: dev@tika.apache.org
    Subject: Re: Tika 1.16?
    
    +1 to 1.15.1.
    
    It would also be nice to be able to have "cheap" security releases as they come up.
    
    Tyler
    
    On Jun 2, 2017 6:12 AM, "Bob Paulin" <bob@bobpaulin.com> wrote:
    
    > Would be breaking a bit from the current release numbering but I'd 
    > fully support moving to semantic versioning.  +1 to a 1.15.1
    >
    > - Bob
    >
    >
    > On 6/2/2017 8:06 AM, Luís Filipe Nassif wrote:
    > > Maybe 1.15.1?
    > >
    > > Em 1 de jun de 2017 10:03 AM, "Bob Paulin" <bob@bobpaulin.com> escreveu:
    > >
    > >> +1
    > >>
    > >>
    > >> On 6/1/2017 6:50 AM, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
    > >>> Given the broken OSGi and the org.json issues with 1.15, does it 
    > >>> make
    > >> sense to aim for 1.16 fairly soon, say 3-4 weeks?
    > >>> Cheers,
    > >>>
    > >>>           Tim
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >>
    > >>
    >
    >
    >
    



Mime
View raw message