Or 1.16 ;)
Proceed my friend!
On 6/28/17, 12:24 PM, "Allison, Timothy B." <tallison@mitre.org> wrote:
POI is available on maven, and I just upgraded.
Unless there are objections, I'll change our
org.apache.tika.parser.sentiment.analysis.SentimentParser
to
org.apache.tika.parser.sentiment.analysis.SentimentAnalysisParser
and we should be good to go for 1.15.1?
Let me know if you'd like to hold off for a bit, but there's always 1.15.2. :)
Cheers,
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Mattmann, Chris A (3010) [mailto:chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 3:39 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tika 1.15.1?
Let me get back to you I’d like to see if we can get some progress on the Age Detector
Parser
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010) Manager, NSF &
Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Offices (8212) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 180-503E, Mailstop: 180-503
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) Adjunct Associate Professor,
Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
On 6/23/17, 10:01 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." <tallison@mitre.org> wrote:
All,
With the exception of the SentimentParser (which we have a path forward on), I think
we're good to go. It looks like POI is about to kick off the release process for 3.17-beta1,
and the batch results look good. I propose waiting a week or so to incorporate that.
Anything else we need to get in for 1.15.1?
Cheers,
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Mattmann [mailto:mattmann@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 2:43 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tika 1.15.1?
Yep agreed on both Tim. If I don’t get it done this weekend, we’ll apply the approach
you mention below.
Great seeing you yesterday!
On 6/16/17, 11:40 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." <tallison@mitre.org> wrote:
All,
I'm hoping to wrap up the TEIParser next week (I'm thinking about modifying code
to handle DOM)...and this should rid us of org.json licensing issues. Run a release for 1.15.1
probably the following week?
Anything else we want to get in to 1.15.1?
Chris, I'm not sure where you are on the SentimentParser. If there will be a
quick fix, great; otherwise, we should be ok with the added exclusions (TIKA-2397) and if
we rename the class in Tika so that we don't have a conflict over oat.parsers.SentimentParser
(TIKA-2368).
Cheers,
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Tyler Bui-Palsulich [mailto:tbpalsulich@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 8:39 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tika 1.16?
+1 to 1.15.1.
It would also be nice to be able to have "cheap" security releases as they come
up.
Tyler
On Jun 2, 2017 6:12 AM, "Bob Paulin" <bob@bobpaulin.com> wrote:
> Would be breaking a bit from the current release numbering but I'd
> fully support moving to semantic versioning. +1 to a 1.15.1
>
> - Bob
>
>
> On 6/2/2017 8:06 AM, Luís Filipe Nassif wrote:
> > Maybe 1.15.1?
> >
> > Em 1 de jun de 2017 10:03 AM, "Bob Paulin" <bob@bobpaulin.com>
escreveu:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >>
> >> On 6/1/2017 6:50 AM, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
> >>> Given the broken OSGi and the org.json issues with 1.15, does
it
> >>> make
> >> sense to aim for 1.16 fairly soon, say 3-4 weeks?
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Tim
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
|