tika-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org>
Subject Re: 1.20?
Date Thu, 13 Dec 2018 22:34:44 GMT
Let me actually take a look before answering. Sorry!

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 5:30 PM Tim Allison <tallison@apache.org> wrote:

>  Thank you for reading the reports!!!
>
> The files are very likely broken.  I can take a look.  The change was
> probably because of an "upgrade" to junrar.  Should I revert to the
> version we used in 1.19.1?
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:34 PM Luís Filipe Nassif <lfcnassif@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tim,
> >
> > Reading your great reports, I also saw some new exceptions with RAR files
> > in likely broken folder, but seems tika was able to extract some text
> from
> > them before. Do you know if those files are really broken and why tika
> > extracted text from them before?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Luis
> >
> > Em qui, 13 de dez de 2018 às 13:02, Tim Allison <tallison@apache.org>
> > escreveu:
> >
> > > Reports are here:
> > >
> > > http://162.242.228.174/reports/tika_1_20-pre-rc1.zip
> > >
> > > I'm going to revert the mp4 parser, and commit the few dependency
> > > upgrades I ran.
> > >
> > > The _major_ difference in content for ppt is explained by the
> > > duplication of header/footer info.  To confirm this, note that the
> > > values for "num_unique_tokens_a" and "num_unique_tokens_b" are
> > > identical for nearly all ppt->ppt, but there are far more tokens in
> > > "num_tokens_a" vs "num_tokens_b".
> > >
> > > I also see that we're losing content in x-java and x-groovy, etc., but
> > > that's because we're now suppressing the style markup that our parser
> > > was (incorrectly, IMHO, inserting) -- check the values in
> > > "top_10_unique_token_diffs_a", e.g.: rgb: 15 | color: 14 | font: 9 |
> > > 0,0,0: 4 | background: 4 | 147,147,147: 3 | 247,247,247: 3 | bold: 3 |
> > > weight: 3 | family: 2
> > >
> > > In short, I think we're good to go.  Will roll rc1 later today or
> > > (more likely) tomorrow unless there are objections.
> > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 9:37 PM Tim Allison <tallison@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Any blockers on 1.20?  I'm going to kick off the regression tests
> > > shortly.
> > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 7:39 PM <loompa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 at 13:00, Tim Allison <tallison@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Dave,
> > > > > >   Should I try to get the Docker plugin working again?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > That would be great. I think I may have went down the wrong path
> > > building
> > > > > an image at package time, as there doesn't seem to be an easy way
> to
> > > > > publish it as an Apache labelled org on Dockerhub unless it builds
> from
> > > > > source.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have some time over the weekend, so could update to where I got
> to
> > > and
> > > > > see what you think.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Dave
> > >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message