tika-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org>
Subject Re: 1.20?
Date Thu, 13 Dec 2018 22:30:30 GMT
 Thank you for reading the reports!!!

The files are very likely broken.  I can take a look.  The change was
probably because of an "upgrade" to junrar.  Should I revert to the
version we used in 1.19.1?
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:34 PM Luís Filipe Nassif <lfcnassif@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> Reading your great reports, I also saw some new exceptions with RAR files
> in likely broken folder, but seems tika was able to extract some text from
> them before. Do you know if those files are really broken and why tika
> extracted text from them before?
>
> Thank you,
> Luis
>
> Em qui, 13 de dez de 2018 às 13:02, Tim Allison <tallison@apache.org>
> escreveu:
>
> > Reports are here:
> >
> > http://162.242.228.174/reports/tika_1_20-pre-rc1.zip
> >
> > I'm going to revert the mp4 parser, and commit the few dependency
> > upgrades I ran.
> >
> > The _major_ difference in content for ppt is explained by the
> > duplication of header/footer info.  To confirm this, note that the
> > values for "num_unique_tokens_a" and "num_unique_tokens_b" are
> > identical for nearly all ppt->ppt, but there are far more tokens in
> > "num_tokens_a" vs "num_tokens_b".
> >
> > I also see that we're losing content in x-java and x-groovy, etc., but
> > that's because we're now suppressing the style markup that our parser
> > was (incorrectly, IMHO, inserting) -- check the values in
> > "top_10_unique_token_diffs_a", e.g.: rgb: 15 | color: 14 | font: 9 |
> > 0,0,0: 4 | background: 4 | 147,147,147: 3 | 247,247,247: 3 | bold: 3 |
> > weight: 3 | family: 2
> >
> > In short, I think we're good to go.  Will roll rc1 later today or
> > (more likely) tomorrow unless there are objections.
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 9:37 PM Tim Allison <tallison@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Any blockers on 1.20?  I'm going to kick off the regression tests
> > shortly.
> > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 7:39 PM <loompa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 at 13:00, Tim Allison <tallison@apache.org>
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Dave,
> > > > >   Should I try to get the Docker plugin working again?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > That would be great. I think I may have went down the wrong path
> > building
> > > > an image at package time, as there doesn't seem to be an easy way to
> > > > publish it as an Apache labelled org on Dockerhub unless it builds from
> > > > source.
> > > >
> > > > I have some time over the weekend, so could update to where I got to
> > and
> > > > see what you think.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Dave
> >

Mime
View raw message