tika-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hudson (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2798) Consider reverting junrar
Date Fri, 14 Dec 2018 20:25:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16721762#comment-16721762
] 

Hudson commented on TIKA-2798:
------------------------------

UNSTABLE: Integrated in Jenkins build tika-branch-1x #143 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/tika-branch-1x/143/])
TIKA-2798 -- revert junrar (tallison: [https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/ad3961063f45a03cbec10d4b5f075111aaa5f56f])
* (edit) tika-parsers/pom.xml


> Consider reverting junrar
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: TIKA-2798
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2798
>             Project: Tika
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Tim Allison
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: AQRJRPYMH3PNNK2HLOOKKR4B3QOVWOUH_1_19_1.rar.json, AQRJRPYMH3PNNK2HLOOKKR4B3QOVWOUH_1_20.rar.json,
attachment_diffs_no_exceptions.xlsx, attachment_diffs_with_exceptions.xlsx
>
>
> [~lfcnassif] noticed junrar regressions in the pre-1.20-rc1 regression reports.  Let's
figure out what's going on and consider reverting the "upgrade".



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Mime
View raw message