tika-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hudson (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2799) Consider reverting jackcess
Date Sat, 15 Dec 2018 00:57:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16721919#comment-16721919
] 

Hudson commented on TIKA-2799:
------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build tika-branch-1x #145 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/tika-branch-1x/145/])
TIKA-2799 - revert jackcess based on regression results (tallison: [https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/1a1f9809b2464c2814d251e2bf4c82c61e59d1e7])
* (edit) tika-parsers/src/test/java/org/apache/tika/parser/microsoft/JackcessParserTest.java
* (edit) tika-parsers/src/main/java/org/apache/tika/parser/microsoft/JackcessOleUtil.java
* (edit) tika-parsers/pom.xml


> Consider reverting jackcess
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: TIKA-2799
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2799
>             Project: Tika
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Tim Allison
>            Assignee: Tim Allison
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.20
>
>
> It looks like there were some very slight regressions in Jackcess 2.2.0 -- we're able
to get slightly less text out of files that threw exceptions, and there's one new exception
on a file that was parsed without problem earlier.
> https://sourceforge.net/p/jackcess/bugs/150/
> https://sourceforge.net/p/jackcess/bugs/149/



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Mime
View raw message