tika-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Preferred logging implementation
Date Mon, 07 Jan 2019 20:12:39 GMT
Not at all bothersome...thank you for the ping!

Would POI actually ship with an implementation (e.g. log4j2) or only
with slf4j?  Our app now uses slf4j with a bridge to log4j.  At some
point -- Tika 2.0(?) -- we might upgrade to  log4j2, but I'd think
we'd want to keep slf4j.


On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 2:58 PM Andreas Beeker <kiwiwings@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi *,
>
> we currently have a discussion on our logging implementation in POI [1].
>
> Do you have any preference?
> ... also besides log4j2 / slf4j, but with integrating as a library in mind.
>
> Sorry, if this kind of discussion is bothersome to you, as there's often a bridge x-to-y
when it comes to logging -
> but I thought decreasing the dependencies might be worth it.
>
> Andi
>
>
> [1] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63046
>

Mime
View raw message