From dev-return-30113-apmail-tika-dev-archive=tika.apache.org@tika.apache.org Mon Jan 7 20:12:51 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tika-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tika-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F2EE5184FC for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 20:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84066 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2019 20:12:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tika-dev-archive@tika.apache.org Received: (qmail 84016 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2019 20:12:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tika.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@tika.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tika.apache.org Received: (qmail 84005 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2019 20:12:51 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mailrelay1-lw-us.apache.org) (207.244.88.152) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 20:12:51 +0000 Received: from mail-yw1-f46.google.com (mail-yw1-f46.google.com [209.85.161.46]) by mailrelay1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 0B6AB43AF for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 20:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw1-f46.google.com with SMTP id h32so658546ywk.2 for ; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 12:12:51 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZvnRQ7yZAFxEql14P9UIL3Z62OcRZuD3dSdBuu6l42StJPAMxD hj6NKD0EgT07NbOcZxRajN1U422FEuwuFYn1qDg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WiP+pfw3FgAQO5sV5b+1n+5qHDSn+e0OP+RbLSks9VZrOT/KlO6ojHua3Su2NVGDykyWQWnPwY5wfs4zKNDgM= X-Received: by 2002:a81:320e:: with SMTP id y14mr63293944ywy.49.1546891970704; Mon, 07 Jan 2019 12:12:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <29b9793c-67f1-cfc9-c726-a79f97a809de@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <29b9793c-67f1-cfc9-c726-a79f97a809de@apache.org> From: Tim Allison Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 15:12:39 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Preferred logging implementation To: dev@tika.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Not at all bothersome...thank you for the ping! Would POI actually ship with an implementation (e.g. log4j2) or only with slf4j? Our app now uses slf4j with a bridge to log4j. At some point -- Tika 2.0(?) -- we might upgrade to log4j2, but I'd think we'd want to keep slf4j. On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 2:58 PM Andreas Beeker wrote: > > Hi *, > > we currently have a discussion on our logging implementation in POI [1]. > > Do you have any preference? > ... also besides log4j2 / slf4j, but with integrating as a library in mind. > > Sorry, if this kind of discussion is bothersome to you, as there's often a bridge x-to-y when it comes to logging - > but I thought decreasing the dependencies might be worth it. > > Andi > > > [1] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63046 >