tinkerpop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Kuppitz ...@gremlin.guru>
Subject Re: Java import wildcards
Date Sun, 02 Aug 2015 13:43:15 GMT
Ok, then let's synchronize the settings. What should we use? 999 and 3?




Cheers,
Daniel

On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 1:50 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmallette@gmail.com>
wrote:

> We've tended toward "no wildcards" and I think we should continue with
> that.  If you find spots where there are wildcards it is likely from a
> rogue settings in someone's ide.  I dont think using wildcards has much of
> a pro when it comes to saving lines of code if you use an ide.....the ide
> makes imports seamless.  Most of the time you don't even notice their
> existence.
> On Aug 1, 2015 7:03 PM, "Matt Frantz" <matthew.h.frantz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Pros:
> > * Less source code
> > * IDE's make it easy to track down source for an unqualified symbol name.
> >
> > Cons:
> > * Without an IDE, it is hard to know what an unqualified symbol name
> means.
> >
> > Since I don't (yet) use an IDE, I appreciate the fully-qualified names,
> but
> > I'm willing to follow the herd.
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message