From dev-return-11257-apmail-tinkerpop-dev-archive=tinkerpop.apache.org@tinkerpop.apache.org Fri Jul 8 10:26:14 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tinkerpop-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tinkerpop-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1B18109C4 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:26:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10453 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2016 10:26:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tinkerpop-dev-archive@tinkerpop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10403 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2016 10:26:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@tinkerpop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@tinkerpop.apache.org Received: (qmail 10389 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2016 10:26:13 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2016 10:26:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 687B7C659A for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:26:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.507 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.507 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C6LzBo3V37uq for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with SMTP id EB9A35F478 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:26:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10382 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2016 10:26:11 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2016 10:26:11 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8FB2C0003 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:26:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:26:10 +0000 (UTC) From: "stephen mallette (JIRA)" To: dev@tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (TINKERPOP-1361) Better extract logic for invalid binding keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1361: ---------------------------------------- Description: Maybe invalid binding keys would be be better managed in a separate class as opposed to being in {{AbstractEvalOpProcessor}}. It could then be independently tested and managed. > Better extract logic for invalid binding keys > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: TINKERPOP-1361 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1361 > Project: TinkerPop > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: server > Affects Versions: 3.1.2-incubating > Reporter: stephen mallette > Priority: Minor > > Maybe invalid binding keys would be be better managed in a separate class as opposed to being in {{AbstractEvalOpProcessor}}. It could then be independently tested and managed. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)