tinkerpop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Dale <robd...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Documentation Organization
Date Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:06:40 GMT
I see changes. I guess the 72 hours is up!

Robert Dale

On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmallette@gmail.com>

> I've been thinking about documentation a bit. I don't think folks are aware
> of all the documentation that we have. The typical example is the IO
> Reference docs which no one every seems to find:
> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/current/dev/io
> I long ago added this documentation landing page:
> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/current
> which I also think no one really knows about, but it lists all of our
> documentation and puts it all into categories. I've updated that a few
> moments ago a little bit (but have not yet published) with a few more
> changes to come:
> https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/commit/0108bfcc0c1646e23a92a459f12dd8
> f48b80a233
> I think we should make this "Compendium" page more the focus of where folks
> go to get documentation. That would mean:
> 1. On the TinkerPop home page, remove "Tutorials" and "Publications"
> sections - right now they are in sync with the Compendium. I sense we're
> missing a few useful publications there. It might also be nice to offer a
> better explanation of what each publication is and why a user would want to
> read them. "Graphendodonticology" is an awesome post, but the title really
> doesn't give anyone a hint as to why they would want to click on it. We
> can't really do that now on the home page without blowing it out super
> long.
> 2. Change the "Documentation" section on the home page to basically look
> like this:
> * TinkerPop Documentation
> ** Reference Documentation
> * Upgrade Documentation
> * Javadoc - [core] / [full]
> So basically, the first bullet above will go to the compendium. The rest of
> the links should be self-explanatory.
> 3. Change the Documentation/Publications to link to the
> Compendium#Publications
> Any thoughts on the matter?

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message