tinkerpop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1849) Provide a way to fold() with an index
Date Wed, 05 Dec 2018 15:08:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16710182#comment-16710182
] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1849:
-------------------------------------------

dkuppitz opened a new pull request #1011: TINKERPOP-1849 Provide a way to fold() with an index
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1011
 
 
   https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TINKERPOP/issues/TINKERPOP-1849
   
   `docker/build.sh -t -i -n` passed and the docs built with `docker/build.sh -d` look good.
   
   VOTE +1

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


> Provide a way to fold() with an index
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-1849
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1849
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: process
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.0
>            Reporter: stephen mallette
>            Assignee: Daniel Kuppitz
>            Priority: Major
>
> In Groovy you can call {{withIndex()}} to generate output like this:
> {code}
> gremlin> g.V().fold().next().withIndex()
> ==>[v[1],0]
> ==>[v[2],1]
> ==>[v[3],2]
> ==>[v[4],3]
> ==>[v[5],4]
> ==>[v[6],5]
> {code}
> We can currently simulate this with Gremlin via:
> {code}
> gremlin> g.V().project("a","b").by().by(select("x").count(local)).store("x").map(union(select('a'),
select('b')).fold()).fold().next()
> ==>[v[1],0]
> ==>[v[2],1]
> ==>[v[3],2]
> ==>[v[4],3]
> ==>[v[5],4]
> ==>[v[6],5]
> {code}
> but it's not easy to follow, efficient, or potentially foolproof. Perhaps we can add
an option to {{fold()}} that would take an enum of "fold operators".



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Mime
View raw message