tinkerpop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From spmallette (GitHub) <git...@apache.org>
Subject [GitHub] [tinkerpop] spmallette commented on issue #1256: Reuse a byte buffer instead of re-allocating it on every loop.
Date Tue, 03 Mar 2020 17:52:36 GMT
> Should we maybe rename the inactive release branches (3.0-dev - 3.2-dev) to avoid confusion?

i'd say that most of the time, the problem is folks heading straight to `master` with their
PR rather than to an older dev branch so i'm not sure we have a problem with inactive branches
at this point. imo, i'd just leave them named as they are until we have a consistent problem
with it.

[ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1256 ]
This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for dev@tinkerpop.apache.org

  • Unnamed multipart/mixed (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message