tomee-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com>
Subject Re: Eclipse Multiple Projects and Missing persistence.xml
Date Thu, 19 Jun 2008 06:59:12 GMT

On Jun 18, 2008, at 11:20 PM, uglything wrote:

>
>
> David Blevins wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jun 18, 2008, at 12:53 AM, uglything wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> You're the man !
>>
>> Muchas gracias!  Or if my suspicions are correct.  Maraming salamat!
>>
>
> If I don't get things wrong, Maraming salamat is a philippines'  
> expression,
> right ?
> Well, I'm a spanish man in france, as Police would say.

Si, es filipino.  Muchos de ellos tienen nombres espanoles, entonces  
nunca sabes :)  Tenemos un committer en el projecto con el apellido  
"Cabrera" y su padre es filipino, entonces sospeche que tu tambien eras.

Bienvenidos en qualquier forma :)

-David

> David Blevins wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I just have to not use the injection annotations in my servlets and
>>> launchers,
>>> but everything else works as expected.
>>
>> We definitely plan to get a Jetty integration in there that has all
>> the same quality of service that we offer with Tomcat.  It's good to
>> know you'd be interested in that kind of functionality as it helps us
>> prioritize.
>>
>
> Then, for the record, I'm very interested in a Jetty integration.
> That could be time saving for me as I develop with Maven2 + Eclipse
> and Jetty is the logical choice for testing in such environment.
>
>
> David Blevins wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I also tryed a JUnit launch on both my synthetic test application
>>> and my
>>> real application and everything works.
>>>
>>> (my synthetic application is described in
>>> http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=17628307&framed=y this
>>> post
>>> and
>>> http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=17666227&framed=y this
>>> other
>>> post
>>> The naming changes for the sake of readibility, but the underlaying
>>> application is the same.
>>> )
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks a million again. I'm still quite new on the OpenEJB forums
>>> but I'm
>>> **truly amazed** by your quickness at adressing the problems.
>>
>> Thanks.  Part of the secret of OpenEJB is that we try very hard to
>> keep the code "lean" and free from needless architecture and over
>> abstraction.  It has a very direct impact on how fast we can turn
>> things around as there is usually very little standing in our way.
>>
>>
>
> That seems to be a good choice... I think I 'll try to be more  
> pragmatic my
> own.
> I realize now that I am probabily "over concepting" my applications.
> I'll take a thourough look at your code and try to learn some coding
> philosophy :working:
>
>
> David Blevins wrote:
>>
>>
>> And very seriously, we do appreciate the questions.  As well if you
>> have any "wouldn't it be neat if..." types of ideas, definitely let  
>> us
>> know.  Small or big, we'll take em all.  Dare to dream :)
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>>
>
> I'll sleep more then, and keep you guys posted with the outcomes :-)
>
> Thanks again !
> Regards,
>
> Juan Manuel
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Eclipse-Multiple-Projects-and-Missing-persistence.xml-tp16391627p17998053.html
> Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>


Mime
View raw message