tomee-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jean-louis.monte...@atosorigin.com>
Subject Re: testing, @Local/@Remote
Date Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:45:26 GMT


joe-2 wrote:
> 
>> Since EJB 3.1, a bean is not required to implement an interface (@local
>> or
>> @remote).
> 
> OK, but this makes only sence for local EJBs?
> Cause in EJB 3.0 i use the Remote Interface to reference the EJB.
> So i guess for RemoteEJBs this explicit Remote-Interface is still needed?
> 
Definitely.

-- 
View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/testing-Local-Remote-tp1474295p1475464.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message