tomee-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Will Hoover" <java.whoo...@gmail.com>
Subject RE: Is OpenEJB + Jetty dead?
Date Tue, 01 May 2012 19:09:41 GMT
I would be interested on how to accomplish it.

BTW, I know the thread is over a year old, but Mark Thomas says it can't be
done yet: http://grokbase.com/t/tomcat/users/113h2c3j55/tomcat-v7-embedded

-----Original Message-----
From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 2:56 PM
To: users@openejb.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is OpenEJB + Jetty dead?

i didnt try it but as in tomee we add servlet programmatically i dont see
anything blocking to do it for listener etc... so i guess that's possible
to use tomcat API to do so

- Romain


2012/5/1 Will Hoover <java.whoover@gmail.com>

> Embedded Tomcat 7 is very limited on functionality. One of the missing
> features is the ability to run within a self-contained executable JAR.
This
> feature is vital when using it as a truly embedded solution. Unless you
> know
> something that I don't (which could very well be the case)?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 2:39 PM
> To: users@openejb.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Is OpenEJB + Jetty dead?
>
> couldnt we use tomcat? i find easy to hack tomcat than starting to
> integrate jetty
>
> thoughts?
>
> - Romain
>
>
> 2012/5/1 Will Hoover <java.whoover@gmail.com>
>
> > A basic solution would probably work in the short-term, but at some
point
> > we
> > would need a certified solution going forward due to vendor
> > requirements/restrictions.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jonathan Gallimore [mailto:jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 1:00 PM
> > To: users@openejb.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Is OpenEJB + Jetty dead?
> >
> > There's obviously been a big focus on Tomcat with the work that's gone
on
> > with getting TomEE released and certified. I've always been really keen
> on
> > getting OpenEJB working with Jetty, and have had a very basic setup
> working
> > which I have previously used for functional testing:
> >
> >
>
>
http://openejb.apache.org/functional-testing-with-openejb,-jetty-and-seleniu
> > m.html
> >
> > I'd love to work on this some more if there's demand for it. Getting
> > something basic working I suspect wouldn't be too difficult, but getting
> a
> > certified solution would probably be a lot of work and so would be a
> longer
> > term goal. Do you need a certified solution or would something more
basic
> > be
> > enough to get you going?
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> > On 1 May 2012, at 13:41, "Will Hoover" <java.whoover@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Is the initial OpenEJB + Jetty now a dead initiative?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The reason why I ask is because the new embedded feature in Tomcat 7
> > still
> > > is cumbersome to implement when compared to Jetty. This is especially
> > true
> > > when a "real" embedded solution is desired that does not require a
> > directory
> > > structure to maintain. Jetty allows you to set handlers without
> > designating
> > > a home directory for web applications (which is very convenient when
> > > embedding within Java SE/JavaFX applications). I know Tomcat has done
> > this
> > > for compliance reasons, but just as OpenEJB has revolutionized the EJB
> > world
> > > by features outside the norm, so has Jetty in some respects. Don't get
> me
> > > wrong, I love Tomcat and use it extensively when applicable, but
> > sometimes
> > > it makes more sense to use Jetty.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>


Mime
View raw message