tomee-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Is OpenEJB + Jetty dead?
Date Tue, 01 May 2012 18:38:43 GMT
couldnt we use tomcat? i find easy to hack tomcat than starting to
integrate jetty

thoughts?

- Romain


2012/5/1 Will Hoover <java.whoover@gmail.com>

> A basic solution would probably work in the short-term, but at some point
> we
> would need a certified solution going forward due to vendor
> requirements/restrictions.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Gallimore [mailto:jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 1:00 PM
> To: users@openejb.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Is OpenEJB + Jetty dead?
>
> There's obviously been a big focus on Tomcat with the work that's gone on
> with getting TomEE released and certified. I've always been really keen on
> getting OpenEJB working with Jetty, and have had a very basic setup working
> which I have previously used for functional testing:
>
> http://openejb.apache.org/functional-testing-with-openejb,-jetty-and-seleniu
> m.html
>
> I'd love to work on this some more if there's demand for it. Getting
> something basic working I suspect wouldn't be too difficult, but getting a
> certified solution would probably be a lot of work and so would be a longer
> term goal. Do you need a certified solution or would something more basic
> be
> enough to get you going?
>
> Jon
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 1 May 2012, at 13:41, "Will Hoover" <java.whoover@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Is the initial OpenEJB + Jetty now a dead initiative?
> >
> >
> >
> > The reason why I ask is because the new embedded feature in Tomcat 7
> still
> > is cumbersome to implement when compared to Jetty. This is especially
> true
> > when a "real" embedded solution is desired that does not require a
> directory
> > structure to maintain. Jetty allows you to set handlers without
> designating
> > a home directory for web applications (which is very convenient when
> > embedding within Java SE/JavaFX applications). I know Tomcat has done
> this
> > for compliance reasons, but just as OpenEJB has revolutionized the EJB
> world
> > by features outside the norm, so has Jetty in some respects. Don't get me
> > wrong, I love Tomcat and use it extensively when applicable, but
> sometimes
> > it makes more sense to use Jetty.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message