tomee-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Fernando Lozano <ferna...@lozano.eti.br>
Subject Re: Tomee Plus instead of Glassfish
Date Mon, 04 Jun 2012 23:36:00 GMT
Agreed
> I understand the good intentions but have to disagree that you should allow a
> bug just because glassfish also allows it.  At what point do you look at a
> container and say, they allow this therefore I should also allow it so its
> easier for them to migrate to my container?  Why select only glassfish?
> What about jboss, weblogic, webspere etc.?
>
> I think a clearly visible error message that exactly describes the problem
> (and recommends using @LocalBean instead as David mentioned) is much more
> preferable.  The problem with allowing it is that you can then end up
> encouraging wrong programming practice for the sake of making people's lives
> easier when migrating non-compliant apps from glassfish to tomee.
>
> Maybe creating a "Migrating Your App from Glassfish to Tomee" webpage would
> be helpful.
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Tomee-Plus-instead-of-Glassfish-tp4655318p4655395.html
> Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message