tomee-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
Subject Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Date Thu, 06 Nov 2014 09:52:20 GMT
Hi, 
Thank you John!
I just added the dependencies for batch as well in https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/,
so that took care of  a few missing tests.
Now it seems that a lot of tests are failing because there is no beans.xml, since on Java
EE 7 the description it's optional.
Cheers,Roberto
      From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
 To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <users@tomee.apache.org> 
 Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:37 AM
 Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
   
Hi
Will not be enough cause of descriptor part but this one is easier to dev
now

Le jeudi 6 novembre 2014, John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hey all,
>
> First, cudos to Roberto for taking on the TomEE support!
>
> It came to my mind after speaking w/ David @ JavaOne about EE7 status.
>
> So quick question.  If we put in hibernate in the TomEE profile, that
> should deploy fine right?  I'm not saying for you guys to put it in, but
> for the sake of the EE sample tests that might help with the JPA 2.1
tests.
>
> John
>
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Roberto Cortez
<radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
>> wrote:
>
>> Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :)
>>      From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
>>  To: Roberto Cortez <radcortez@yahoo.com>
>> Cc: "users@tomee.apache.org" <users@tomee.apache.org>; David Blevins <
>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
>>  Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM
>>  Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>>
>> seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't
>> provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use
>> tomee-remote with plus classifier configured):
>>
>>
>>                <dependency>
>>                    <groupId>org.apache.batchee</groupId>
>>                    <artifactId>batchee-jbatch</artifactId>
>>                    <version>0.2-incubating</version>
>>                </dependency>
>>                <dependency>
>>                    <groupId>org.apache.johnzon</groupId>
>>                    <artifactId>johnzon-core</artifactId>
>>                    <version>0.1-incubating</version>
>>                </dependency>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>:
>> > great, thks
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > @rmannibucau
>> > http://www.tomitribe.com
>> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> > https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >
>> >
>> > 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <radcortez@yahoo.com>:
>> >> Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to
>> delete
>> >> and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the
>> same
>> >> url:
>> https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>> >>
>> >> ________________________________
>> >> From: Roberto Cortez <radcortez@yahoo.com.INVALID>
>> >> To: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>; "
users@tomee.apache.org
>> "
>> >> <users@tomee.apache.org>
>> >> Cc: David Blevins <david.blevins@gmail.com>
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM
>> >>
>> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >>
>> >> Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>    From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> To: "users@tomee.apache.org" <users@tomee.apache.org>; Roberto Cortez
>> >> <radcortez@yahoo.com>
>> >> Cc: David Blevins <david.blevins@gmail.com>
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >>
>> >> Hello Roberto,
>> >>
>> >> is it broken again? I get 404
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> @rmannibucau
>> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
>> >:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the
>> >>> latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>>
>> >>> Roberto
>> >>>
>> >>>      From: Roberto Cortez <radcortez@yahoo.com>
>> >>>  To: David Blevins <david.blevins@gmail.com>; "users@tomee.apache.org
"
>> >>> <users@tomee.apache.org>
>> >>>  Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM
>> >>>  Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi David,
>> >>> Thanks for a warm welcome :)
>> >>> The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using
>> the
>> >>> Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They
>> are
>> >>> looking into it.
>> >>> Cheers,Roberto
>> >>>      From: David Blevins <david.blevins@gmail.com>
>> >>>  To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez <radcortez@yahoo.com>
>> >>>  Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM
>> >>>  Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >>>
>> >>> First -- welcome, Roberto!  Great to see you on the list :)
>> >>> We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT.  Would be great to
>> track
>> >>> these.  What CI are you using?  We could set something up on the
>> Apache side
>> >>> if needed.
>> >>>
>> >>> -David
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez
>> >>> <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi guys,
>> >>> I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here.
>> >>> I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here:
>> >>> https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added
>> profiles
>> >>> to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples
/
>> tests
>> >>> we got the following results:
>> >>> batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are
>> >>> related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few
>> tests.
>> >>> DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI
>> >>> comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel -
>> Missing
>> >>> Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic
>> - No
>> >>> Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests.
>> Related
>> >>> with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test
>> >>> Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p -
>> OKjta -
>> >>> Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet -
>> Failing a
>> >>> few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test
>> Failureswebsocket -
>> >>> OK
>> >>> These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more
detail
>> >>> into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side.
>> >>> Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also
>> missing
>> >>> a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI
>> environment,
>> >>> but it will be there.
>> >>> Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
>> >>> Cheers,Roberto
>> >>>      From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
>> >>>  To: users@tomee.apache.org
>> >>>  Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
>> >>>  Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
>> >>>
>> >>> Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, "tibor17" <tibor17@lycos.com> a écrit :
>> >>>>
>> >>>> See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>>
http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
>> >>>>
>> >>>> It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE
>> 7.0.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in
the
>> >>>> tomee
>> >>>> zip).
>> >>>> This decision would speedup the release.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since
it
>> >>> usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to
>> stay
>> >>> apache.
>> >>>
>> >>> Well stay openjpa i think.
>> >>>
>> >>> Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had
>> the
>> >>> same about bval...one week of work and we got it.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> View this message in context:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>>
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html
>> >>>> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>

-- 


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau

  
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message