tomee-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ActiveMQ Artemis?
Date Tue, 06 Oct 2015 16:41:56 GMT
@Clebert: seems a JCA requirement, TomEE used it for its JCA integration -
maybe not other servers. I can't find in the spec something making one or
the other choice wrong - which is sounds like a lack to me but maybe I
missed a part, browsed the spec quite quickly.


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>

2015-10-06 18:27 GMT+02:00 clebertsuconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>:

>
> >> On the definition of the RA, do you agree it should define a different
> interface though?
>
>
> I couldn't understand your last post well.. it seems your response got
> garbled with the quote..
>
> But anwering this specific statement, I understand it as a requirement for
> Tomee... we can make the change.. I try to make it before next release:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-245
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Artemis-tp4676407p4676426.html
> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message