tomee-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ActiveMQ Artemis?
Date Tue, 06 Oct 2015 17:05:55 GMT
sorry.. dumb copy & paste.. I meant... Thanks.. it will have to be
researched as part of this *task* when working on it.

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Clebert Suconic
<clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks.. it will have to be researched as part of this class.
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <rmannibucau@gmail.com> wrote:
>> if artemis implements javax.resource.spi.DissociatableManagedConnection we
>> shouldnt proxy it then, does artemis knows how to handle this event? If not
>> the proxies is used to handle it.
>>
>> Side note: this is geronimo-connector which handles this code (ie you can
>> reproduce it without tomee in a test case if it can help on artemis side)
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau>
|
>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>
>> 2015-10-06 18:50 GMT+02:00 Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> The issue is not at the CreateEndpoint method.. the issue is that
>>> Tomee RA requires an interface returned and defined somewhere at the
>>> configuration for the ConenctionManager:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/6/api/javax/resource/spi/ConnectionManager.html#allocateConnection(javax.resource.spi.ManagedConnectionFactory,%20javax.resource.spi.ConnectionRequestInfo)
>>>
>>>
>>> Artemis will return objects that the Endpoints will understand, but
>>> due to some classLoading model on Tomee this has to be an interface
>>> due to the Dynamic proxies created.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> <rmannibucau@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > @Clebert: seems a JCA requirement, TomEE used it for its JCA integration
>>> -
>>> > maybe not other servers. I can't find in the spec something making one or
>>> > the other choice wrong - which is sounds like a lack to me but maybe I
>>> > missed a part, browsed the spec quite quickly.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>> > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>> >
>>> > 2015-10-06 18:27 GMT+02:00 clebertsuconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>:
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> >> On the definition of the RA, do you agree it should define
a
>>> different
>>> >> interface though?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> I couldn't understand your last post well.. it seems your response got
>>> >> garbled with the quote..
>>> >>
>>> >> But anwering this specific statement, I understand it as a requirement
>>> for
>>> >> Tomee... we can make the change.. I try to make it before next release:
>>> >>
>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-245
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> View this message in context:
>>> >>
>>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Artemis-tp4676407p4676426.html
>>> >> Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Mime
View raw message