tomee-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Performance issue with Bean validation ?
Date Thu, 08 Dec 2016 18:25:19 GMT
this case was not impacted by the fix but you can set to false
openejb.cxf.rs.bval.active


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
<https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>

2016-12-08 19:24 GMT+01:00 COURTAULT Francois <
Francois.Courtault@gemalto.com>:

> Hello,
>
> Of course it will be linked to the validation complexity (for example
> validation with a reg exp will be slower, I guess, than a not null
> validation) but I want to compare the time for a rest call with bean
> validation and without any bean validation and measure the ratio. This is
> why I have mentioned 2%, 10% or ..., overhead with bean validation vs
> without any bean validation.
>
> So any figure for bean validation average overhead ?
>
> Best Regards.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com]
> Sent: jeudi 8 d├ęcembre 2016 18:40
> To: users@tomee.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Performance issue with Bean validation ?
>
> you mean removed? on the reported cases it was seconds so very visible.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog <
> https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau>
> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory <
> https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
>
> 2016-12-08 18:36 GMT+01:00 COURTAULT Francois <
> Francois.Courtault@gemalto.com>:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Any idea about the overhead introduced : 2%, 10%, 20% ?
> >
> > Best Regards.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com]
> > Sent: mercredi 7 d├ęcembre 2016 09:02
> > To: users@tomee.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Performance issue with Bean validation ?
> >
> > yes
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog <
> > https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <
> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> > <https://github.com/rmannibucau>
> > | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
> > | <
> > https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> >
> > 2016-12-07 9:01 GMT+01:00 COURTAULT Francois <Francois.Courtault@gemalto.
> > com
> > >:
> >
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > I think I have seen quite recently some exchanges about performance
> > > issue due to the Bean validation usage.
> > > I just want to know if it has been fixed or not  in TomEE 7.0.2 ?
> > >
> > > Best Regards.
> > > ________________________________
> > > This message and any attachments are intended solely for the
> > > addressees and may contain confidential information. Any
> > > unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
> > > E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be
> > > liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are
> > > not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and
> > > notify the
> > sender.
> > > Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this
> > > transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for
> > > damages caused by a transmitted virus.
> > >
> > ________________________________
> >  This message and any attachments are intended solely for the
> > addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized
> > use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
> > E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable
> > for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the
> > intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the
> sender.
> > Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this
> > transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for
> > damages caused by a transmitted virus.
> >
> ________________________________
>  This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees
> and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or
> disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
> E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for
> the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended
> recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
> Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission
> free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a
> transmitted virus.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message