tomee-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Danilo Cominotti Marques <dcominot...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 7.0.3 release
Date Thu, 23 Mar 2017 01:58:11 GMT
I have just noticed that there is a page called "download-ng" that has the
latest version,

http://tomee.apache.org/download-ng.html

and there is a "downloads" page that is oudated,

http://tomee.apache.org/downloads.html

Shouldn't the oudated "downloads" page be removed?

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Danilo Cominotti Marques <
dcominottim@gmail.com> wrote:

> Interesting. I was accessing
>
> http://openejb.apache.org/downloads.html
>
> but I see that
>
> http://tomee.apache.org/download-ng.html
>
> has the latest version. Is the former webpage/domain "deprecated"?
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Daniel Cunha <danielsoro@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Weird.
>>
>> I can see it.
>> Can be cache in your browser?
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Danilo Cominotti Marques <
>> dcominottim@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I am still not seeing it on the website.
>> >
>> >
>> > ​
>> >
>> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> >> hmm, it is on the website:
>> >>
>> >> [image: Images intégrées 1]
>> >>
>> >> will fix the tag now
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> >> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
>> >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>> >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
>> >> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
>> >>
>> >> 2017-03-22 21:15 GMT+01:00 Danilo Cominotti Marques <
>> >> dcominottim@gmail.com>:
>> >>
>> >>> OK, it seemed confusing because the release doesn't show up on the
>> >>> website
>> >>> nor on the Releases section from GitHub. Thanks for the update.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> >>> rmannibucau@gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > 2017-03-22 20:49 GMT+01:00 Danilo Cominotti Marques <
>> >>> dcominottim@gmail.com
>> >>> > >:
>> >>> >
>> >>> > > Thanks for the previous answers. Regarding meecrowave, I think
it
>> >>> really
>> >>> > > needs some extra basic info in the quickstart on how to get
up and
>> >>> > running
>> >>> > > with Maven ASAP, because I just couldn't do it. As for TomEE
>> 7.0.3,
>> >>> is
>> >>> > > there any news? It seems the code from the repository is on
the
>> 7.0.4
>> >>> > cycle
>> >>> > > already but there hasn't been a 7.0.3 release yet.
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > it is on central
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:30 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> >>> > rmannibucau@gmail.com
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > wrote:
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > > 2017-02-24 8:50 GMT+01:00 Danilo Cominotti Marques <
>> >>> > > dcominottim@gmail.com
>> >>> > > > >:
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > Well this should move to openwebbeans@ list (meecrowave
is a
>> >>> > subproject
>> >>> > > of
>> >>> > > > openwebbeans not tomee) ;)
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > In my opinion, that's really exciting! I hadn't heard
of
>> Meecrowave
>> >>> > > before
>> >>> > > > > this email. Congratulations for the efforts.
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > > Meecrowave OAuth2 sounds insanely helpful too --
and a lot
>> >>> simpler to
>> >>> > > > > configure than JBoss KeyCloak, based on what I saw
the last
>> time
>> >>> I
>> >>> > > looked
>> >>> > > > > at it.
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > > Should Meecrowave work out of the box with Bean
Validation and
>> >>> > Jackson
>> >>> > > > > (with the JAX-RS extension) if they are included
in the
>> >>> classpath?
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > Not by default since it is not cdi code but it is not
that hard:
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > - for jackson you will ikely need to deactivate the default
json
>> >>> > provider
>> >>> > > > (through the cli or setter if you code the main) setting
>> >>> > > > jaxrs-default-provider to org.apache.johnzon.jaxrs.JsrProvider
>> >>> only
>> >>> > > > probably and produce the jackson one, for instance:
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > @Produces
>> >>> > > > public JacksonJsonProvider jackson() {
>> >>> > > >     return new JacksonJsonProvider();
>> >>> > > > }
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > This is likely the hardest since jackson is not yet very
jaxrs 2
>> >>> > friendly
>> >>> > > > (its @Consumes/@Produces) so you need to switch off defaults
>> >>> providers
>> >>> > > > which have a higher priority by default but it is not
that hard.
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > - for bean validation, once added to the classpath:
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > @Produces
>> >>> > > > public BeanValidationFeature bvalIntegration() {
>> >>> > > >     return new BeanValidationFeature();
>> >>> > > > }
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > That's it :).
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > > Additionally, I didn't see any mention of DataSource
>> >>> configurations
>> >>> > in
>> >>> > > > the
>> >>> > > > > documentation, but I suppose it should fine because
of TomEE
>> >>> > embedded,
>> >>> > > is
>> >>> > > > > that right?
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > Meecrowave is just cdi+jaxrs. It has a few extensions
for jpa
>> but
>> >>> it is
>> >>> > > > *extensions*. Doc is on
>> >>> > > > http://openwebbeans.apache.org/meecrowave/meecrowave-jpa/ind
>> >>> ex.html.
>> >>> > You
>> >>> > > > love it or hate it cause it makes the resources part
of the app
>> (vs
>> >>> > > managed
>> >>> > > > by the container for tomee case for instance). Both have
pros
>> and
>> >>> cons
>> >>> > > and
>> >>> > > > I have to admit depending the app both make sense (no
silver
>> bullet
>> >>> > ;)).
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > > Thanks!
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > > Regards,
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > > Danilo Cominotti Marques
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<
>> >>> > > > rmannibucau@gmail.com
>> >>> > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > wrote:
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > > > did a few on my blog
>> >>> > > > > > https://blog-rmannibucau.rhclo
>> ud.com/#/search;query=meecrowave
>> >>> and
>> >>> > > > there
>> >>> > > > > > is
>> >>> > > > > > the website openwebbeans.apache.org/meecrowave
>> >>> > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > > strictly speaking it is mainly inspired from
recent tomee
>> >>> embedded
>> >>> > > > > changes
>> >>> > > > > > but simplifying it a lot and making the stack
>> >>> consistent/uniform
>> >>> > (we
>> >>> > > > > can't
>> >>> > > > > > at tomee cause of all possibilities we have).
It is limiting
>> >>> it to
>> >>> > > > > > cdi+jaxrs (not even jpa). Opens a lot of doors
nowaday even
>> >>> you can
>> >>> > > > feel
>> >>> > > > > > frustrated for JPA backends.
>> >>> > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >>> > > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
|  Blog
>> >>> > > > > > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
| Old Blog
>> >>> > > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> |
Github <
>> >>> https://github.com/
>> >>> > > > > > rmannibucau> |
>> >>> > > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
| JavaEE
>> >>> > Factory
>> >>> > > > > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
>> >>> > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > > 2017-02-23 22:25 GMT+01:00 hwaastad <helge@waastad.org>:
>> >>> > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > > > Meecrowave........
>> >>> > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > > > Is that a new kid on the block?  ;-)
>> >>> > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > > > Seriously, seems cool, any blog articles
yet?
>> >>> > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > > > /hw
>> >>> > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > > > --
>> >>> > > > > > > View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440
>> .
>> >>> > > > > > > n4.nabble.com/7-0-3-release-tp4681145p4681150.html
>> >>> > > > > > > Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list
archive at
>> Nabble.com.
>> >>> > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > >
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Cunha
>> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message