trafficserver-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>
Subject Re: plugging into the backside of ATS?
Date Sat, 28 May 2011 00:34:41 GMT
The implication being that if you need a distributed cache, you should try our  clustering
features.

Cheers,

-- leif

On May 27, 2011, at 3:37 PM, John Plevyak <jplevyak@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> Just an FYI, the clustering support in the proxy right now is optimized for some non-obvious
case: very
> large documents are streamed in chunks, and header matching occurs on the cache which
contains the
> document which minimizes round trips, staging to disk handles the long tail, etc.
> 
> I think that you will find that replacing the disk cache with memcache will not improve
performance and
> will likely run into some subtle problems.  However, I am interested to see the results.
  BTW: I have
> a memcache on TS implementation around somewhere, for a persistent memcached.
> 
> john
> 
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Earle, Erik <Erik.Earle@disney.com> wrote:
> Is there a good starting point for looking at plugging into the internals of ATS. 
> 
>  
> 
> For example, suppose I wanted to replace the default caching mechanism with memcache
or add a full http client (like libcurl) without blocking in a continuation callback thread.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message