trafficserver-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Adam W. Dace" <colonelforbi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ATS Storage Question
Date Fri, 18 Oct 2013 17:12:39 GMT
I'm essentially leasing a virtual machine on the cheap, and I didn't see
any such option from the company I'm hosting it with.


On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>wrote:

> Am 18.10.2013 18:40, schrieb Adam W. Dace:
> > Yeah, I'm not trying to debate that filesystem is faster than raw disk.
>  It's just not really an option for me.
> > Heck, one of the caches I'm running is completely virtualized. Sorry, no
> raw disk there
>
> uhm?
>
> [root@proxy:~]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep hypervisor
> flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat
> pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2
> ss syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts nopl xtopology
> tsc_reliable nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni
> pclmulqdq ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes hypervisor lahf_lm ida arat
> epb pln pts dtherm
>
> hypervisor = VMware vSphere 5 guest
>
> our whole infrastructure is 100% virtualized including the ATS machine
> but i see no reason why you can't avoid the guest-FS and assign the
> virtual disk dedicated to ATS
>
> in case of virtualization it is even more important to avoid the
> additional filesystem layer because there are enough layers with
> latency (guest, host, SAN)
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
____________________________________________________________
Adam W. Dace <colonelforbin74@gmail.com>

Phone: (815) 355-5848
Instant Messenger: AIM & Yahoo! IM - colonelforbin74 | ICQ - #39374451
Microsoft Messenger - colonelforbin74@live.com <adam@turing.com>

Google Profile: https://plus.google.com/u/0/109309036874332290399/about

Mime
View raw message