trafficserver-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Adam W. Dace" <colonelforbi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ATS Storage Question
Date Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:14:08 GMT
Unfortunately, not an option for me.  Although, honestly, I prefer
filesystem-based storage anyways.

I was just wondering if there's a "right answer" here.


On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>wrote:

>
> Am 18.10.2013 18:01, schrieb Adam W. Dace:
> > I've already noticed ATS tends to slow down a bit when using database
> files above 2GB...but it got me thinking.
> > Does anyone know which would be more efficient: 2 database files at 2GB
> each...or 4 database files at 1GB each?
>
> no file at all is the solution -> RAW device
>
> [root@proxy:~]$ cat /etc/trafficserver/storage.config
> # Storage Configuration file
>
> # /etc/udev/rules.d/50-ats.rules
> # Apache Traffic Server owns disk for RAW access
> # KERNEL=="sdc", OWNER="ats"
>
> /dev/sdc
>
>


-- 
____________________________________________________________
Adam W. Dace <colonelforbin74@gmail.com>

Phone: (815) 355-5848
Instant Messenger: AIM & Yahoo! IM - colonelforbin74 | ICQ - #39374451
Microsoft Messenger - colonelforbin74@live.com <adam@turing.com>

Google Profile: https://plus.google.com/u/0/109309036874332290399/about

Mime
View raw message