trafficserver-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Peach <jpe...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Has anyone compiled / tested ATS on CentOS 6.2?
Date Sun, 13 Oct 2013 15:31:08 GMT
On Oct 13, 2013, at 8:21 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> wrote:

> i do *not* understand your argumentation
> 
> * if you have a virtual server *you* are the one typing "yum upgrade"
> * if you have a managed server demand them to do their job
> * why does security not bother somebody these days?
> * CentOS 6.3/6.4 are *security* updates
> 
> that's the same someone says "CentOS 5.5 is fine"
> no, it is not -> type "yum upgrade" and you are on 5.9

Let's not get off-topic here.

Adam, we don't have a CentOS 6.2 build bot, but we support 5.x and 6.x. I think that you will
be fine.

J

> 
> Am 13.10.2013 17:04, schrieb Adam W. Dace:
>> The simple answer for me is bandwidth, bandwidth...and oh yes, bandwidth.
>> 
>> I've actually been using Rackspace for a virtual server parent cache for a while
and they are awesome.
>> However, they charge for bandwidth...so I've been hacking parent.config like crazy
in an attempt
>> to avoid -any- video going across the Internet.  It sucks kind of.
>> 
>> I actually found Linode from a banner ad on a website somewhere, and these wonderful
people include
>> 2 TB of bandwidth for essentially the same monthly cost.  That their distro is a
little old honestly doesn't bother me.
>> 
>> Thanks for the vote of confidence...think I'm going to just fire up a virtual machine
and give it a shot.  :-)
>> 
>> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net <mailto:h.reindl@thelounge.net>>
wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>    Am 13.10.2013 <tel:13.10.2013> 16:45, schrieb Adam W. Dace:
>>> I've got a few days before I commit myself, but I think I've found a cheaper
alternative to Rackspace to host my
>>> parent web cache.  :-)
>>> 
>>> Anyways, all they have available for CentOS is v6.2 and I was wondering if anyone's
compiled / tested ATS on it.
>> 
>>    besides the answer below short ago why in the world CentOS 6.2?!
>>    current is 6.4 and since CentOS/RHEL has a stable API/ABI it
>>    is pretty dumb to ignore these security updates which
>>    you are receive with yum - so whoever can offer CentOS6
>>    but *not* CentOS 6.2 because this is a specific patchlevel
>> 
>> 
>>    -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>>    Betreff:        Re: [VOTE] Release v4.0.2
>>    Datum:  Sat, 12 Oct 2013 14:01:47 +0800
>>    Von:    Mohd Akhbar <mymohaja@gmail.com <mailto:mymohaja@gmail.com>>
>>    Antwort an:     users@trafficserver.apache.org <mailto:users@trafficserver.apache.org>
>>    An:     users@trafficserver.apache.org <mailto:users@trafficserver.apache.org>
>> 
>>    Compiled and tested on Centos 6.4 without any prob. +1
> 


Mime
View raw message