trafficserver-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net>
Subject Re: Different Cache Disk for different size of objects
Date Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:21:32 GMT


Am 21.03.2016 um 19:19 schrieb Muhammad Faisal:
> OK. But this feature can be added right? May be in future releases.
> It can improve caching performance by avoiding seek time of disks which
> increase over the period of time with high disk WR.

but what do you are doing with a 2 GB reponse without a size header in 
the meantime until you know where to store? buffer it in memory?

> ------ Original Message ------
> From: "Leif Hedstrom" <zwoop@apache.org <mailto:zwoop@apache.org>>
> To: users@trafficserver.apache.org
> <mailto:users@trafficserver.apache.org>; "Muhammad Faisal"
> <faisalusuf@yahoo.com <mailto:faisalusuf@yahoo.com>>
> Sent: 3/21/2016 9:52:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Different Cache Disk for different size of objects
>>
>>> On Mar 18, 2016, at 3:35 AM, Muhammad Faisal <faisalusuf@yahoo.com
>>> <mailto:faisalusuf@yahoo.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Is this possible to allocate a different disk for different object
>>> sizes? Below is the scenario I'm trying to implement:
>>> Object size <1MB -----> SSD
>>> Object Size > 1MB ----> HDD
>>> This will improve Caching performance as smaller objects will be
>>> served from SSD while larger objects will reside on the HDD.
>>
>>
>> No, not at this point. Part of the issue is that we select “storage”
>> before going to origin, so you don’t know what the size is going to be
>> before you get the response. And at that point, you (currently) can’t
>> move to a different storage / volume. But @amc would know best


Mime
View raw message